Rootstock Effects on Chardonel Productivity, Fruit, and Wine Composition

Main, Gary L.; Morris, J. R.; Striegler, Keith

doi:10.5344/ajev.2002.53.1.37

Cited by 38 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rootstocks had no effect on yield but did affect berry composition. The lack of rootstock effect on yield does not align with other studies' findings which show that yield can vary among rootstock selection [5,9,[32][33][34][35][36]. However, yield variation among rootstocks was shown to vary between growing seasons, as reported by Bettiga (2015).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

“…Consequently, parentage is carefully considered when making a commercial rootstock selection for this reason. Despite the primary purpose of rootstocks being used to address soil pest pressures, attention has more recently focused on improving vineyard production with respect to vegetative growth, fruit composition, the timing of phenological events, and wine quality [5]. Anecdotally, rootstock selection is also considered influential in initial establishment success.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts

Munoz,

Stauch,

Wootten

et al. 2023

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant benchgrafted vines. Thus, little is known regarding the specific establishment trends of green-growing benchgrafts. This study aimed to explore the role rootstock selection has in green-growing benchgraft establishment and development over the first four years post-planting. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc was grafted onto multiple rootstocks of varying parentage, including ‘101-14MGT’ (V. riparia × V. rupestris), ‘1103P’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘110R’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘420A MGT’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia), and ‘Teleki 5C’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia). The experimental site was organized using a completely randomized design (n = 12) with all vines managed to industry-standard cultural practices. Vines grafted onto 1103P had the largest average trunk diameter (p = 0.0012) and circumference (p < 0.0001) at 22.2 mm and 7.57 cm, respectively. Vines grafted onto 110R had the second-largest trunk circumference at 6.65 cm. Vines grafted onto 110R had the largest concentration of total non-structural carbohydrates at planting at 1.47 g/L, followed by 1103P at 1.25 g/L (p < 0.0001). Total non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the trunk during dormancy was the highest in 110R at 16.0% total dry weight (p = 0.0008). The larger trunk size and more extensive carbohydrate reserves suggest that green-growing benchgrafts using 110R or 1103P have a higher capacity and likelihood of establishment success.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts

Munoz,

Stauch,

Wootten

et al. 2023

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, the root system × year effect in the present study was significant for many (but not all) experimental factors (see Table 1). Variables such as yield, cluster weight, number of clusters per vine, and berry weight showed significant differences from one year to the next, clearly demonstrating the strong influence of environmental and weather conditions (Corino and Castino 1990;Hidalgo 2002;Main et al 2002;Santiago et al 2007). In 2011 (the first production year), there were lower production and cluster weights probably because the vineyard was not yet fully mature, but fruit that year had higher SSC.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Rootstocks can improve vine performance and winegrape quality by regulating scion vigor (McCraw et al 2005;Migicovsky et al 2021;Reynolds and Wardle 2001;Sabbatini and Howell 2013;Tandonnet et al 2010), addressing water stress (Striegler et al 1993), imparting disease and pest resistance (East et al 2021;Ferris et al 2012), controlling uptake of specific nutrients (Gautier et al 2020;Lambert et al 2008;R€ uhl et al 1988), improving winterhardiness (Gu et al 2005;McCraw et al 2005;Striegler and Howell 1991), and shortening the vegetative cycle to allow more veraison-toharvest heat units (Reynolds and Wardle 2001). Rootstocks can also influence juice quality (Gu et al 2005;Main et al 2002;Striegler et al 2005;Vanden Heuvel et al 2004) and ultimately wine quality (Krstic et al 2005). These attributes, especially phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) and nematode (phylum Nematoda) resistance (East et al 2021;Whiting 2012Whiting , 2004, support significant grapevine rootstock use worldwide.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of ‘Chambourcin’ Winegrape on 10 Different Root Systems in Southern Missouri, USA

Bozzolo

Thomas

Harris

et al. 2023

hortte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the midwestern United States, especially Missouri, winegrape (Vitis sp.) growers mostly plant interspecific hybrids, which are well adapted to the climate and pests of the region. ‘Chambourcin’ (an interspecific French-American hybrid) is one of the most widely planted winegrape cultivars in the area. It is usually grown as own-rooted (nongrafted) vines because the economic and horticultural benefits of grafting this cultivar to rootstocks have not been well developed. Further, few significant winegrape rootstock evaluations have been conducted in the midwestern United States, including evaluations of newer rootstocks developed and released by private and public breeding programs. The aim of this study was to assess the potential value of using rootstocks in ‘Chambourcin’ production in southern Missouri, with implications for the midwestern United States. Fruit yield, vine growth, and fruit composition metrics from ‘Chambourcin’ on 10 different root systems [own-rooted, and grafted to rootstocks ‘Couderc 3309’, ‘Couderc 1616’, ‘Paulsen 1103’, ‘Sélection Oppenheim 4’, ‘Millardet et de Grasset 420A’, ‘Millardet et de Grasset 101-14’, ‘Kingfisher’, ‘Matador’ (all Vitis sp.), and ‘Gloire de Montpellier’ riverbank grape (Vitis riparia)] in an experimental vineyard in southwest Missouri were compared. Following three establishment years (2008–10), data were collected across four growing and vintage seasons (2011–14). Yield components evaluated included total fruit production, clusters per vine, cluster weight, berry weight, weight of cane prunings, and crop load. Petiole mineral analysis was conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2014. Grape juice attributes measured were soluble solids concentration, juice pH, titratable acidity (TA), potassium (K), anthocyanins, tannins, phenolics, and organic acids. When simply comparing grafted vs. ungrafted vines, grafting generally induced higher plant vigor and a higher pH in the juice, whereas the other parameters did not differ. When the performances were compared among the 10 root systems, vines grafted to ‘Couderc 3309’ had higher yields compared with vines grafted to six other rootstocks and own-rooted vines. Grafting to ‘Millardet et de Grasset 101-14’ induced higher cluster weight compared with the other rootstocks. The ‘Millardet et de Grasset 420A’ rootstock promoted a higher pH and TA as well as a higher concentration of K in the juice, and ‘Paulsen 1103’ also promoted high pH, TA, and malic acid in the juice, and higher concentrations of phosphorous (P) and K in the petiole compared with most rootstocks. ‘Gloire de Montpellier’ induced a lower P content in the petiole and a higher tartaric/malic acid ratio. Rootstock use can strongly influence some vineyard production metrics as well as nutrient uptake and K levels in the juice (the latter further influencing juice pH). The results of this study provide insights into the complex viticultural and enological interactions resulting from the use of rootstocks in hybrid winegrape production in Missouri, USA.

show abstract

“…Grapevine rootstocks influence vegetative growth, fruit quality, and vine productivity (Keller;Mills;Harbertson, 2012;El-Gendy, 2013). Freedom rootstock increases the vigor of the scion (Main;Morris;Striegler, 2002;Rizk-Alla;Sabry;Abd El-Wahab, 2011), while Paulsen rootstock decreases the vigor (Walker;Read;Blackmore, 2000;Keller;Mills;Harbertson, 2012). Paulsen rootstock can improve the fruit quality (physical and chemical characteristics) of Flame seedless and enhance the commercial value of grapes compared to the quality and value of the grapes grown using Freedom rootstock El-Khateeb, 2017;El-Banna;Lo'ay, 2019;Doaa, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physiological and chemical performance of the Flame seedless grapevine cultivar in the presence of Paulsen 1103 as the interstock

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interstock is commonly used in deciduous fruit trees as a sustainable strategy to reduce the vigor of the scion associated with the high quality of fruits. In this study, we tested the effect of Paulsen 1103 (Vitis berlandieri x Vitis rupestris) as interstock on the grafting success, growth, and the physiological and chemical parameters of Flame seedless (Vitis vinifera) grapevine grafted onto Freedom (Vitis champinii x 1613C) and Paulsen 1103 rootstocks. This study was conducted over two seasons (2019 and 2020). The results indicated that direct grafting on the Paulsen 1103 rootstock recorded the highest grafting success percentage. Moreover, the grafting success percentage increased significantly when Paulsen 1103 was used as interstock between Flame seedless and Freedom rootstock (FI/P/Fr) compared to the grafting success without Paulsen 1103 interstock (FI/Fr). Also, using Paulsen 1103 as interstock between Flame seedless scion and Freedom rootstock (FI/P/Fr) significantly reduced the morphological parameters (shoot length, leaf area and the dry weight of shoots and roots) and physiological parameters of leaf (relative water content, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance) but significantly increased the leaf chemical content (peroxidase activity, total phenols, total proline, and total soluble sugar content) compared to values of the parameters measured in Flame seedless grafted onto Freedom rootstock (FI/Fr). Peroxidase activity could be used for predicting the degree of compatibility in grapevine grafts. This study suggested that the effect of Paulsen 1103 interstock on the vegetative growth of scion is correlated with its effect on chemical content and physiological responses of the scion.

show abstract

Rootstock Effects on Chardonel Productivity, Fruit, and Wine Composition

Cited by 38 publications

References 3 publications

Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts

Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts

Performance of ‘Chambourcin’ Winegrape on 10 Different Root Systems in Southern Missouri, USA

Physiological and chemical performance of the Flame seedless grapevine cultivar in the presence of Paulsen 1103 as the interstock

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About