1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00048147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root growth and functioning under atmospheric CO2 enrichment

Abstract: This paper examines the extent to which atmospheric CO2 enrichment may influence growth of plant roots and function in terms of uptake of water and nutrients, and carbon allocation towards symbionts. It is concluded that changes in dry matter allocation greatly depend on the experimental conditions during the experiment, the growth phase of the plant, and its morphological characteristics. Under non-limiting conditions of water and nutrients for growth, dry matter partitioning to the root is not changed by CO2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(68 reference statements)
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is commonly observed when nutrients are limiting (e.g. Stulen & den Hertog 1993). However, allometric relationships between root dry weight and shoot dry weight were not altered by growth under CO 2 enrichment (Tables 1 & 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is commonly observed when nutrients are limiting (e.g. Stulen & den Hertog 1993). However, allometric relationships between root dry weight and shoot dry weight were not altered by growth under CO 2 enrichment (Tables 1 & 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Increases in root to plant weight ratio in response to high CO 2 are often reported when plants are nitrogen-or water-stressed (e.g. Stulen & den Hertog 1993). This may result in relatively more root surface area for the same plant mass, allowing a more thorough exploration of the soil for nutrient and water acquisition (Allen et al 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, changes in PRLC could result from changes in standing root length, and may not necessarily be related to AMF abundance. Since standing root length (as m root plant −1 or m root m −2 ground area) varies among plant species (Einsmann et al 1999;Kembel and Cahill 2005) and developmental stages (Troughton 1956;Bartelink 1998), as well as environmental characteristics such as ecosystem type (Schenk and Jackson 2002a), season (Hendrick and Pregitzer 1996), soil moisture (Schenk and Jackson 2002b), nutrient availability (Chapin 1980;Reynolds and Dantonio 1996;Ostertag 2001), and atmospheric CO 2 (Stulen and Denhertog 1993;Pritchard et al 2008), any shifts in PRLC may occur due to changes in colonized root length, standing root length, or both.…”
Section: What Influences Prlc?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree allocation of C to fine roots is a function of above-and below-ground resource availability and intrinsic physiological characteristics that are under genetic control (Brouwer, 1983 ;Bloom, Chapin & Mooney, 1985). For example, root growth increases along with plant size under elevated atmospheric CO # (Bille ' s, Rouhier & Bottner, 1993 ;Larigauderie, Reynolds & Strain, 1994 ;Rogers, Runion & Krupa, 1994 ;Tingey et al, 1996), but elevated CO # affects the proportion of C allocated to roots only under certain growth-limiting soil conditions (Stulen & den Hertog, 1993 ;Curtis & Wang, 1998). By contrast, the rate of fine root turnover is known to increase with soil N availability in some species (Pregitzer, Hendrick & Fogel, 1993 ;Pregitzer et al, 1995).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%