2016
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage

Abstract: Abstract.Root diseases are known to suppress forest regeneration and reduce growth rates, and they may become more common as susceptible tree species become maladapted in parts of their historic ranges due to climate change. However, current ecosystem models do not track the effects of root disease on net productivity, and there has been little research on how the dynamics of root disease affect carbon (C) storage and productivity across infected landscapes. We compared the effects of root disease against the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding to the uncertainty in future stand productivity forecasts is the fact that not all maimed tree volume is lost. Damaged trees with poor stem form significantly reduce saw-log lumber recovery and from a timber productivity viewpoint represent a loss of growth, similar to non-lethal growth reductions associated with pathogens such as root disease, which are difficult to model [47]. We cannot state with certainty that the higher than expected rates of loss we observed have been influenced by climatic changes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Adding to the uncertainty in future stand productivity forecasts is the fact that not all maimed tree volume is lost. Damaged trees with poor stem form significantly reduce saw-log lumber recovery and from a timber productivity viewpoint represent a loss of growth, similar to non-lethal growth reductions associated with pathogens such as root disease, which are difficult to model [47]. We cannot state with certainty that the higher than expected rates of loss we observed have been influenced by climatic changes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Thus, the FIA classification is a supervised approach, and the FIA groupings are static and wellrecognized. The FIA forest types and forest type groups are widely used in maps of forest resources, ecosystem services, pest impacts and risk, and to inform initial conditions in forest landscape dynamics modeling studies (Ruefenacht et al 2008;DeSantis et al 2013;Duveneck et al 2015;Healey et al 2016).…”
Section: The Three Classifications and Their Assignment To Fia Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samuti on teada, et kahjurite ja patogeenide tõttu emiteerivad kahjustatud puistud süsinikku enam kui seovad (Kurz et al, 2008), biootilistest kahjustajatest tingitud häiringud mõjutavad seega märkimisväärselt ka metsa süsiniku üldist varu või selle muutusi (Hicke et al, 2012). Teiseks näiteks hinnati hiljuti ühe võrreldava metsaala piires Põhja-Ameerikas juure-mädanikest tingitud süsiniku emissiooni võrreldavaks isegi tulekahju ja lageraie mõjuga (Healey et al, 2016) (Dubin & Walper, 1967;Bassett, 1969;Lang & Karadžić, 1987;Drenkhan et al, 2014a;Mullett & Fraser, 2015). Ülalnimetatud globaalsest andmebaasist järeldub, et enim kahjustab punavöötaud mägi-(P. mugo Turra) ja musta mändi (P. nigra Arn.)…”
Section: Sissejuhatusunclassified