2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40663-017-0123-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying forest inventory data into species-based forest community types at broad extents: exploring tradeoffs among supervised and unsupervised approaches

Abstract: Background: Knowledge of the different kinds of tree communities that currently exist can provide a baseline for assessing the ecological attributes of forests and monitoring future changes. Forest inventory data can facilitate the development of this baseline knowledge across broad extents, but they first must be classified into forest community types. Here, we compared three alternative classifications across the United States using data from over 117,000 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used an Ivan damage boundary map from the Alabama Forestry Commission [ 47 ] to select FIA plots located inside the damage zone. The FIA data for the plots in the area were downloaded and extracted from the Microsoft Access State database applications (USDA Forest Service FIA Datamart webpage ( https://apps.fs.usda.gov/fia/datamart/datamart.html ) [ 45 , 54 ]. We selected our sample from post Ivan plots that were collected between 2006–2012 (Post-Ivan_1 event).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used an Ivan damage boundary map from the Alabama Forestry Commission [ 47 ] to select FIA plots located inside the damage zone. The FIA data for the plots in the area were downloaded and extracted from the Microsoft Access State database applications (USDA Forest Service FIA Datamart webpage ( https://apps.fs.usda.gov/fia/datamart/datamart.html ) [ 45 , 54 ]. We selected our sample from post Ivan plots that were collected between 2006–2012 (Post-Ivan_1 event).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison proceeds in most cases until a plurality of a forest type is identified." Each of the forest types are associated with one higher level forest type-group (n = 31 including "Nonstocked" forest) that represents an aggregation of like forest types (Costanza et al, 2018). We used the forest type-group classification rather than individual forest types to account for differences in species composition in a tractable number of classes while maintaining a sufficient sample size to analyze effects of site quality in most forest type-groups.…”
Section: Developing Plot-level Estimates Of Forest Carbon Density Sta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset is a 250-m resolution map of the USA forest types generated from MODIS imagery and Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plot data (Ruefenacht et al 2008). Forest types are assigned to FIA plots using a decision tree based on the relative stocking values of tree species in the plot, which are primarily a function of basal area (Arner et al 2003;Costanza et al 2018). To provide additional validation for this map, we selected the most abundant forest types within the study area (Table 1), and used two field plot datasets: 6068 FIA plots from Montana and Idaho, and 39,852 Gradient Nearest Neighbor (GNN) plots from Washington and Oregon.…”
Section: Existing Forest Type Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%