2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root cellulose drives soil fulvic acid carbon sequestration in the grassland restoration process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grass roots are likely to be contributing to the underground biomass and playing a fundamental role in accumulating carbon in these two systems. A recent study evaluating SOM at different pasture restoration times in China determined that larger root networks increase carbon stocks with increasing depth (Bai, Guo, Huang, & An, 2020). Our results corroborating these recent findings indicate that pasture plays an important role in improving and increasing the quantity and quality of carbon in SOM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Grass roots are likely to be contributing to the underground biomass and playing a fundamental role in accumulating carbon in these two systems. A recent study evaluating SOM at different pasture restoration times in China determined that larger root networks increase carbon stocks with increasing depth (Bai, Guo, Huang, & An, 2020). Our results corroborating these recent findings indicate that pasture plays an important role in improving and increasing the quantity and quality of carbon in SOM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The higher root/shoot ratio in the MIX system may partially explain the higher C input in this system. Roots are the largest contributor of C in the soil, mainly due to their higher cellulose content (Bai et al., 2020). Roots also promote greater physical protection of C in microaggregates, particularly in systems with higher N input (Kong & Six, 2010), and there is a relationship between cover crop root growth and soil C accumulation in tropical environments (Rosolem et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing organic matter content increases C sequestration in the soil, which can mitigate the negative effects of the greenhouse effect (Cotrufo et al., 2019). Traditional agricultural practices such as conventional tillage with no cover crop and monoculture (Guimarães et al., 2013) and degraded pastures limit C sequestration (Bai et al., 2020), resulting in soil degradation and reduced agricultural production, particularly in tropical climate environments and sandy soils (Gomes et al., 2017). By contrast, soil management conservation systems such as no‐till favor higher C stocks in the soil (Raphael et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so far as we know, studies have primarily focused on natural restoration (Bai et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2019), while the impacts of artificial restoration have been mostly overlooked (Baoyin & Li, 2009;Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous field studies have linked increased SOC storage to higher above‐ and belowground litter C input following vegetation restoration (Huang et al, 2022; Kalinina et al, 2013). However, so far as we know, studies have primarily focused on natural restoration (Bai et al, 2020; Yu et al, 2019), while the impacts of artificial restoration have been mostly overlooked (Baoyin & Li, 2009; Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%