2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room temperature ultrafast InGaAs Schottky diode based detectors for terahertz spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid-state electronic devices are significantly faster than these. For example, Schottky diodes have τ ≥ 5 ps with NEP ∼100 pW Hz –1/2 , but their performances rapidly decrease with operational frequency greater than 3 THz or when implemented in an array configuration . CMOS-based FETs are best suited for multipixel integration; broadband operation up to 9 THz with NEP ∼10 pW Hz –1/2 and with τ < 1 μs has been reported. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid-state electronic devices are significantly faster than these. For example, Schottky diodes have τ ≥ 5 ps with NEP ∼100 pW Hz –1/2 , but their performances rapidly decrease with operational frequency greater than 3 THz or when implemented in an array configuration . CMOS-based FETs are best suited for multipixel integration; broadband operation up to 9 THz with NEP ∼10 pW Hz –1/2 and with τ < 1 μs has been reported. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no direct measuring femtosecond electrical response has been reported by using experimentally time‐domain electrical set‐up due to the limitation in sampling ability and bandwidth. [ 3,62–65 ] Although measuring femtosecond response by using optical or spectral methods (e.g., transient absorption spectroscopy [ 66 ] ) may be feasible, the optical/spectral methods are not suitable for directly measuring electrical response time of our novel nanodevices due to the formidable difficulties in complex photo‐electronic signal conversion. Here, the ultrafast electrical responses of our nanodiodes have been demonstrated by the combination of experimental measurements, theoretical analysis, and simulation evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measuring ultrafast femtosecond electrical response by using the conventional time‐domain method [ 3,62–65 ] is beyond the ability of available wide‐band oscilloscopes. Therefore, how to evaluate practical operation speed in femtosecond range is crucially important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Detector type R V NEP [nW Hz −0.5 ] Frequency (THz) Response time Ref. Graphene-based 20–600 V W −1 0.08–1 0.01–0.8/ 1.8–4.25 1 ns to 9 μs 48 , 49 , 51 55 Si FET 10–5000 V W −1 0.01–199 0.1–4.52 10 μs to 100 ms 39 46 Tunneling rectifier 4 kV W −1 2 × 10 −4 0.13 NA 56 Schottky diode 100–1000 V W −1 4 × 10 −3 –1 0.1–1 0.1 ns 57 , 58 Microbolometer 500–760 V W −1 0.1–0.2 1 140 μs 61 , 62 a VO 2 -based oscillator 21.28 GHz/W NA Optical 10 μs 74 VO 2 -based bolometer 36.9–124 V W −1 NA 0.075–0.11 83 ms 64 , 68 This work DC: 76 kV/W, AC: 66.3 MHz/W 5 0.01–0.22 308 μs a The VO 2 -based oscillator of ref. 74 works in the visible range, and the central frequency of oscillations is within the range of MHz, so between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude higher than the carrier frequency of our setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%