1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.122403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room temperature spin relaxation in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells

Abstract: We have explored the dependence of electron spin relaxation in undoped GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells on well width (confinement energy) at 300 K. For wide wells, the relaxation rate tends to the intrinsic bulk value due to the D’yakonov–Perel (DP) mechanism with momentum scattering by phonons. In narrower wells, there is a strong dependence of relaxation rate on well width, as expected for the DP mechanism, but also considerable variation between samples from different sources, which we attribute to differences in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and second terms in equation (3) are associated with the optically induced linear and circular birefringence and are known as the SOKE and the specular inverse Faraday effect (SIFE), respectively. Our rotation measurements do not fully characterize the cubic susceptibility tensor, only the combination of components given in equations (4) and (5). From figures 4, 6 and 8 we might conclude that the SIFE dominates the zero-delay peak in GaAs [7], the SOKE is dominant in Al, while the more complicated dependence in Ni is the result of competition between the SIFE and the SOKE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first and second terms in equation (3) are associated with the optically induced linear and circular birefringence and are known as the SOKE and the specular inverse Faraday effect (SIFE), respectively. Our rotation measurements do not fully characterize the cubic susceptibility tensor, only the combination of components given in equations (4) and (5). From figures 4, 6 and 8 we might conclude that the SIFE dominates the zero-delay peak in GaAs [7], the SOKE is dominant in Al, while the more complicated dependence in Ni is the result of competition between the SIFE and the SOKE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Spin relaxation effects in semiconductors and quantum well structures have been studied intensively [5]. The coherent control of spin orientation has been demonstrated in experiments performed at low temperatures and in high magnetic fields,and using the optical Stark effect [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to GaAsbased systems, relatively little attention has been paid to InAs, even although it may be important in future spintronics applications. We previously measured spin lifetimes in narrow-gap semiconductors ͑NGSs͒, Hg 1Ϫx Cd x Te and InSb, at wavelengths between 4 and 10 m over the temperature range of 4 to 300 K. 4 We have now extended those measurements to include bulk epilayers of InAs as a function of doping at 300 K.The 4,6,7 which excites spins in the semiconductor with above-bandgap, circularly polarized light, and probes the induced bleaching with either the same or the opposite circularly polarized light ͑SCP or OCP, respectively͒. The pump and probe beams are pulsed, and by changing the time delay between the pump and probe, and comparing the SCP and OCP results, we measure the spin decay lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spin relaxation was attributed to Bychkov-Rashba spin splitting in these asymmetric wells, estimating the corresponding ប␣ BR in Eq. (88) to be around 1ϫ10 Ϫ14 eV m (Wilamowski and 84 Here is a list of selected references with useful data on s in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells: confinement energy dependence has been studied by Tackeuchi et al (1996); Britton et al (1998) ;Ohno, Terauchi, et al (1999; Endo et al (2000); Malinowski et al (2000); temperature dependence is treated by Wagner et al (1993); Ohno, Terauchi, et al (1999; Malinowski et al (2000); Adachi et al (2001); carrier concentration dependence is studied by Sandhu et al (2001); dependence on mobility is examined by Ohno, Terauchi, et al (1999); and dependence on magnetic field is studied by Zhitomirskii et al (1993). .…”
Section: Low-dimensional Semiconductor Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%