2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romidepsin enhances the cytotoxicity of fludarabine, clofarabine and busulfan combination in malignant T-cells

Abstract: Novel approaches to pre-transplant conditioning are needed to improve treatment of advanced T-cell malignancies. We investigated the synergism of fludarabine (Flu), clofarabine (Clo), busulfan (Bu), and romidepsin (Rom) in T-cell lines and patient-derived cell samples. [Flu+Clo+Bu+Rom] had combination indexes of 0.4–0.5 at ~50% cytotoxicity in PEER and SUPT1 cells, suggesting synergism. Drug exposure resulted in histone modifications, DNA-damage response (DDR), increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), decrease… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the DNA alkylator Bu exacerbates the down-regulation of the NuRD complex and further enhances the cytotoxicity of [Npb+DAC+Rom] (Figure 6 ). The presence of DAC and Rom in the combination may relax chromatin [ 36 ] and make the DNA more susceptible to Bu alkylation. Furthermore, the observed down-regulation of the Bu transporter MRP1/ABCC1 may result in an increased intracellular concentration of the active alkylating agent, resulting in more pronounced DNA damage (Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the DNA alkylator Bu exacerbates the down-regulation of the NuRD complex and further enhances the cytotoxicity of [Npb+DAC+Rom] (Figure 6 ). The presence of DAC and Rom in the combination may relax chromatin [ 36 ] and make the DNA more susceptible to Bu alkylation. Furthermore, the observed down-regulation of the Bu transporter MRP1/ABCC1 may result in an increased intracellular concentration of the active alkylating agent, resulting in more pronounced DNA damage (Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 6 In treating lymphoma or refractory solid tumours, 8–17.5 mg/m 2 Rom is given at days 1, 8, and 15 (Supplementary Table S2 ). 30 , 41 Calculations based on NCI’s Equivalent Surface Area Dosage Conversion Factors 42 suggest that administering 1000 mg/m 2 Gem, 15 mg/m 2 Rom, and 70 mg/m 2 Cis to humans is equivalent to administering 324 mg/kg Gem, 5 mg/kg Rom, and 23 mg/kg Cis to mice (Supplementary Table S2 ). Considering the synergy and toxicity 5 , 41 of Rom+Cis+Gem, we formulated dose-reduced combination regimens containing 20 mg/kg Gem, 1 mg/kg Rom, and/or 5 mg/kg Cis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found potently cytotoxic against several human cancer cell lines, but has no effect on normal cells in vivo (Ueda et al, 1994;Valdez et al, 2016). Ngercheumicin D with 3-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid [140], a depsipeptide macrocycle, was isolated from Photobacterium strains and was active against the nonpathogenic Pseudovibrio denitrificans (Kjaerulff et al, 2013;Adachi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sulfur-containing Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%