2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10060360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roman Aqueduct Flow Estimation Using Geomatic Measurement

Abstract: The aqueducts built by the ancient Romans are among the most impressive evidence of their engineering skills. The water inside the aqueducts was transported for kilometers, exploiting only the slight but constant differences in altitude throughout the route. To keep the differences in height constant, the aqueducts could proceed underground or aboveground on well-known arched structures that supported lead, ceramic or stone pipes. In order to reconstruct the characteristics of these structures, it is necessary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as it seems clear from the figure 2 they were also used as pivot points to determine aqueduct path: a significative change in direction of the latter can be indeed observed at each of them. The slope is much greater than the usual slope for the aqueducts over the arches (in opere arcuate) which varies between 0.1% and 0.2% (Alimonti et al, 2018;Alimonti et al, 2021;Corbellini et al, 1917). This difference might be due to the different in strength between the artificial structures (the arches) and the underground portions: the latter can obviously support greater pressures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, as it seems clear from the figure 2 they were also used as pivot points to determine aqueduct path: a significative change in direction of the latter can be indeed observed at each of them. The slope is much greater than the usual slope for the aqueducts over the arches (in opere arcuate) which varies between 0.1% and 0.2% (Alimonti et al, 2018;Alimonti et al, 2021;Corbellini et al, 1917). This difference might be due to the different in strength between the artificial structures (the arches) and the underground portions: the latter can obviously support greater pressures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Generally, a good agreement is observed, even higher than expected, considering the accuracy of about 1.8 metres assumed for the cartography and that of 0.4 metres declared for the laser scanning. In figure 3 it is possible to observe the contribution of the proper correction of the altimetry due to the different datum used then and now (42cm added to the IGM DEM; Alimonti et al, 2021). After the correction, the area where virtually no difference could be observed and the values were close to 0 becomes much larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, detailed information on the IGM map datum cannot be conclusively ascertained (Mori, 1922). We then use the planimetric (Baiocchi and Lelo, 2010) and the altimetric (Alimonti et al, 2021) information used in some contemporary maps of the area of Rome. The cartography has been reprojected in the currently used datum (EPSG:7792; EPSG, 2021) and then interpolated in QGIS using an algorithm based on the TIN networks that allow estimating the terrain even in flat areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%