2014
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.8.3705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of E-Cadherin (CDH1) Genetic Variations in Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis

Abstract: E-Cadherin (CDH1) genetic variations may be involved in invasion and metastasis of various cancers by altering gene transcriptional activity of epithelial cells. However, published studies on the association of CDH1 gene polymorphisms and cancer risk remain contradictory, owing to differences in living habits and genetic backgrounds. To derive a more better and comprehensive conclusion, the present meta-analysis was performed including 57 eligible studies of the association between polymorphisms of CDH1 gene p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the well established role of somatic changes in CDH1 in cancer invasion and metastasis, a number of studies have investigated the associations of CDH1 germline variants with risk of various human cancers. A meta-analysis concluded that one SNP in the promoter region, rs16260 (-160 C>A), was associated with increased risk of all cancers, but not with breast cancer in stratified analyses by cancer type (49). In our AA population, we did not find any association of rs16260 with breast cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Given the well established role of somatic changes in CDH1 in cancer invasion and metastasis, a number of studies have investigated the associations of CDH1 germline variants with risk of various human cancers. A meta-analysis concluded that one SNP in the promoter region, rs16260 (-160 C>A), was associated with increased risk of all cancers, but not with breast cancer in stratified analyses by cancer type (49). In our AA population, we did not find any association of rs16260 with breast cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…This has also been observed in several other populations, as reported in previous meta-analyses (Chen et al, 2011, Cui et al, 2011Wang et al, 2011;Li et al, 2012;Deng et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2015) including several studies and a large number of samples. However, the mutated genotype A/A of the -160C>A SNP was associated with increased DGC risk in a Mexican population (N = 39 diffuse GC) (20.5%, OR = 6.5, 95%CI = 2.1-19.6) (Medina-Franco et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was used to evaluate every eligible study by using the goodness-of-fit 2 test as previous study described [12]. ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs were used to estimate the strength of association between ESR1 rs1801132 (C > G), rs2077647 (A > G) and cancer risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%