2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-018-0571-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of Digital Innovation in Design Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Design Science Research paradigm as described by Hevner and Ram [72], Hevner et al [73] guided the research process, as illustrated in Figure 1. Based on the identified need for a tool that supports the modeling of values in a networked context of a complex system such as a sustainable business model (see Section 3), a modeling concept in the form of the "values and needs layer" was developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Design Science Research paradigm as described by Hevner and Ram [72], Hevner et al [73] guided the research process, as illustrated in Figure 1. Based on the identified need for a tool that supports the modeling of values in a networked context of a complex system such as a sustainable business model (see Section 3), a modeling concept in the form of the "values and needs layer" was developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSR is an important paradigm in IS research as it serves as a guideline for the process of constructing socio-technical artifacts in the IS domain [26]. We follow the process of Peffers et al [27] for creating design science artifacts and then map these artifacts onto the digital innovation roles in DSR, as proposed by [28]. In order to adequately consider current issues and practical experiences, the requirements of SMEs for such a framework were analyzed from both the provider and user perspectives in a previous work [25,29].…”
Section: Proposal Of a New Cloud Brokering Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehrere Design Cycles, die auch von unterschiedlichen Forschern durchlaufen werden, sichern (als vierte Perspektive), dass das Problem -wie es in der Problemstellung gefordert ist -einen gewissen Abstraktionsgrad hat und die Lösung generalisiert werden kann. Hier zeigen sich in neueren Diskussionen zwei Entwicklungen: zum einen wird zunehmend darauf verwiesen, dass die Wissensbasis zu den Kernel-Theorien auch Wissen in Form von Solution Design Entities (also Wissen zu erarbeiteten IT-Artefakten) sowie in Form von Solution Design Theories umfasst (Hevner et al 2018). Letztere unterstützen als Design-Theorien Design-Prozesse (vgl.…”
Section: Grundkonzeptunclassified