2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.594168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Tonsillectomy in the Management of Carcinomas of Unknown Primary of the Head and Neck: A Retrospective Study Based on p16 Analysis

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the impact of tonsillectomy on the detection of the primary tumor, based on p16 immunohistochemistry analysis, in patients with cervical unknown primary of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC-CUP). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 63 patients, included from January 2008 to December 2017 in a single institution. All patients had an initial assessment with physical examination, CT scan of the neck and chest, whole body FDG-PET CT, and endoscopy under general anesthesia, which failed to de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high rate of subclinical (occult) primary lesions detected by PET-CT and EUA confirms recent results from a meta-analysis demonstrating the highly increased probability to detect small lesions given combined utilization of these modern approaches (26). Mostly, the primary tumors identified in our cohort were located in the base of tongue or palatine tonsils, in line with recent data (27,28). At time of NSCCUP diagnosis and more than 6 months thereafter a total of six (five within 60 months) occult HNSCC tumors were detected in our cohort 1 but only two in cohort 2 (compare Table 1 and Figure 2F).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high rate of subclinical (occult) primary lesions detected by PET-CT and EUA confirms recent results from a meta-analysis demonstrating the highly increased probability to detect small lesions given combined utilization of these modern approaches (26). Mostly, the primary tumors identified in our cohort were located in the base of tongue or palatine tonsils, in line with recent data (27,28). At time of NSCCUP diagnosis and more than 6 months thereafter a total of six (five within 60 months) occult HNSCC tumors were detected in our cohort 1 but only two in cohort 2 (compare Table 1 and Figure 2F).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…cisplatin-based PORCT already introduced in 2004. However, the treatment in cohort 2 is in line with recommendations according to guidelines and clinical evidence (7,8,(25)(26)(27)(28)(30)(31)(32)(33). Some analyses suffer from impossibility to obtain pathologic data not included in the available reports, and molecular data including p16 status is missing especially in cohort 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…With respect to the HPV status, the likelihood of finding the primary tumor in a base-of-tongue mucosectomy in HPV-negative carcinomas of unknown primary seems much lower than in their HPV-positive counterparts (13% versus approximately 50%), and most studies to date included mainly HPV-positive patients [ 6 , 56 , 57 ]. Therefore, in HPV-negative carcinomas of occult primary, the risk/benefit balance of base-of-tongue mucosectomy seems currently unfavorable.…”
Section: Tors Applications In Hncmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search identified 16 studies including over 2700 patients 5,[10][11][12][13][14][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] . 11 studies documented detection rate with tonsillectomy 5,10-14,18,19-22 (table 2 & 3), 9 studies quoted the rates of synchronous tonsillar SCC 5,11,12,14,19,[23][24][25][26] (not necessarily HNSCCUP 23,24 ) (table 4) and 3 examined the role of HPV status in cancer detection following tonsillectomy 19,24,27 (table 5).…”
Section: Diagnostic Procedures For the Tonsilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies investigated the efficacy of random tonsil biopsies versus tonsillectomy 5,10,11,18,19 (Table 2). The rate of positive findings on tonsil biopsy ranged from 0 19 -16.7% 18 in these studies, whereas positive findings on tonsillectomy ranged from 25.5 19 -44.3% 14 (table 2-5).…”
Section: Deep Tonsil Biopsy Versus Tonsillectomymentioning
confidence: 99%