2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of T1 mapping to evaluate brain aging in a healthy population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a gain compared to conventional methods such as FLAIR or T2‐weighted images. We found no significant increase in T1 and T2 with either age or gender, although a number of studies demonstrated that T1 does change with age 57,58 . This might be due to the smaller number of subjects since we split between the healthy and diseased subjects and the narrow age range, especially for the healthy subjects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a gain compared to conventional methods such as FLAIR or T2‐weighted images. We found no significant increase in T1 and T2 with either age or gender, although a number of studies demonstrated that T1 does change with age 57,58 . This might be due to the smaller number of subjects since we split between the healthy and diseased subjects and the narrow age range, especially for the healthy subjects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…We found no significant increase in T 1 and T * 2 with either age or gender, although a number of studies demonstrated that T 1 does change with age. 57,58 This might be due to the smaller number of subjects since we split between the healthy and diseased subjects and the narrow age range, especially for the healthy subjects. Further analysis of this might be performed when more subjects are measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…overlap with pathologies such as inflammation and edema [5]. On the other hand, and despite these limitations, a diagnostic benefit of quantitative T1 mapping of the brain has been convincingly demonstrated for a number of conditions, including hepatic encephalopathy [6], multiple sclerosis [7][8][9], sickle cell anemia [10], epilepsy [11], heavy metal deposition [12], neurofibromatosis [13], brain tumor follow-up [14,15], infantile brain development [16][17][18] and aging [19]. The continuing desire for a viable quantitative MR sequence is also reflected in the multitude of recent faster mapping approaches, such as the MP2RAGE sequence [20], synthetic MRI [21] and MR fingerprinting [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies indicated that the characterization of these processes could be realized using quantitative MRI biomarkers of brain tissue microstructure [9,10]. Quantitative MR techniques have been used to study multiple central nervous system conditions by providing useful information for assessing diseases' microscopic biophysical processes [11][12][13]. However, so far, no studies have explored T1, T2 relaxation times of the brain pathophysiology in ADHD, where brain microstructure abnormalities could potentially be uncovered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myelin has a key role in brain microarchitectural changes. Quantitative MRI parameters provide well-de ned physical parameters and can be applied to estimate the human brain's development [13,14]. Speci cally, the T1 relaxation time is affected by myelin, water, and iron concentrations in brain tissue; myelin content affects the T1 value, and iron de ciency prolongs the T1 value [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%