2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy: A cohort study

Abstract: Prophylactic use of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing cholecystectomy was found to reduce the seroma formation significantly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, their use should be driven by a proven benefit. One systematic review [89] and several RCTs [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] on the use of subcutaneous drains in abdominal surgery were found. They cover a wide range of operative indications: liver surgery, colorectal surgery, cholecystectomy, gynaecological surgery, caesarean section, and gastric bypass surgery.…”
Section: Subcutaneous Drains In Laparotomy Incisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their use should be driven by a proven benefit. One systematic review [89] and several RCTs [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] on the use of subcutaneous drains in abdominal surgery were found. They cover a wide range of operative indications: liver surgery, colorectal surgery, cholecystectomy, gynaecological surgery, caesarean section, and gastric bypass surgery.…”
Section: Subcutaneous Drains In Laparotomy Incisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allaire et al 15 conducted a prospective randomized study on 79 women undergoing cesarean delivery and found that the use of closed suction drainage in the subcutaneous space may reduce the incidence of wound seroma, infection and gaping. In a cohort study, Chowdri et al 16 reported reduction in seroma formation in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy after using subcutaneous drain (8.8% in study group vs. 33.6% in control group). Gallup et al 17 in their prospective study on 197 patients concluded that use of subcutaneous drains plus prophylactic antibiotics may decrease wound related complication rate when operating on obese gynecologic patients (20% in study group vs. 31% in control group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no studies on usage of subcutaneous closed suction drain in emergency laparotomies for perforative peritonitis in the literature. However, similar studies using subcutaneous closed suction drain have been done for colorectal surgeries, caesarean delivery and other elective abdominal surgeries 13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . In a study conducted by Ahmet et.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, findings regarding the utility of subcutaneous drains in the prevention of incisional SSI remain controversial, and some studies have found that subcutaneous drains do not reduce the incidence of SSI. [14][15][16][17] Our previous study also showed the possibility that subcutaneous drains would be useful only for patients with a high risk for incisional SSI and those with thick subcutaneous fat tissue, but not for all patients undergoing colorectal surgery. 13 A possible reason is that subcutaneous drain appears to be unnecessary or rather harmful in patients without thick subcutaneous fat tissue, since the drain is a foreign substance for the human body.…”
Section: S Urgical Site Infection (Ssi) Including Wound Infection (Imentioning
confidence: 99%