2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4340-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of nucleus accumbens μ opioid receptors in the effects of morphine on ERK1/2 phosphorylation

Abstract: These findings confirm the differential effects of morphine in rats and mice Acb and that D1 receptors exert a facilitatory role on ERK1/2 phosphorylation; furthermore, they indicate that, in rats, removal of the D1-dependent pERK1/2 expression discloses the stimulatory influence of morphine on ERK1/2 phosphorylation and that the morphine's ability to decrease pERK1/2 expression is mediated by Acb μ-opioid receptors. Future experiments may disentangle the psychopharmacological significance of the effects of mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study also confirm that both ethanol (Porru et al 2020(Porru et al , 2021Rosas et al 2017) and morphine (Rosas et al 2016;Valjent et al 2004) activate ERKs phosphorylation in the AcbSh of CD1 mice and show for the first time that both WSE (50 mg/kg) and DF (2 mg/ kg) are able to prevent these increases. The acute effects of WSE and DF in the prevention of either ethanol-or morphine-induced ERKs phosphorylation in the AcbSh was assessed, in distinct cohorts of animals, to better define the molecular mechanisms leading to WSE's and DF's prevention of the acquisition of ethanol-or morphine-elicited CPP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of the present study also confirm that both ethanol (Porru et al 2020(Porru et al , 2021Rosas et al 2017) and morphine (Rosas et al 2016;Valjent et al 2004) activate ERKs phosphorylation in the AcbSh of CD1 mice and show for the first time that both WSE (50 mg/kg) and DF (2 mg/ kg) are able to prevent these increases. The acute effects of WSE and DF in the prevention of either ethanol-or morphine-induced ERKs phosphorylation in the AcbSh was assessed, in distinct cohorts of animals, to better define the molecular mechanisms leading to WSE's and DF's prevention of the acquisition of ethanol-or morphine-elicited CPP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Their activation by either non-contingent (Acquas et al, 2007; Ibba et al, 2009; Lin et al, 2010; Valjent et al, 2004) or contingent (Faccidomo et al, 2015; Peana et al, 2013; Radwanska et al, 2008) drug exposure represents a critical biochemical event that bridges drug exposure to long-term behavioral consequences (Shiflett and Balleine, 2011; Sweatt, 2001). Accordingly, the role of MEK was shown to be critical for the acquisition of place preference conditioned by d-amphetamine (Gerdjikov et al, 2004), ecstasy (Salzmann et al, 2003), morphine (Lin et al, 2010; Mazzucchelli et al, 2002; Rosas et al, 2016; Spina et al, 2010) and cocaine (Valjent et al, 2000); with the exception, to the best of our knowledge, of ethanol (Groblewski et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the current data indicates that high levels of ERK phosphorylation, irrespective of activation time, is associated with negative physiological outcomes. For example, high levels of pERK are typically seen within the shell of the nucleus accumbens (early and late phase) and the VTA (early phase) (mesolimbic system) following the administration of morphine and fentanyl and is associated with preference for drug paired chambers in mice and rats using the conditioned place preference assay (Lesscher et al, 2003, Rosas et al, 2016. While in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, high levels of pERK are associated with antinociceptive tolerance and hyperalgesia (Bobeck et al, 2016, Deng et al, 2019.…”
Section: Kurkinol and Kurkinorin Are Potent Activators Of Erkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further limitation of this study is that the dose response effects on ERK phosphorylation at early and late time points were never assessed due to time restrictions. As previously discussed, the biphasic nature of ERK activation is thought to play a role in the different physiological effect of μ receptor agonists, with late-phase (or β-arrestin2 dependent) believed to be involved with abuse liability, tolerance, and hyperalgesia (Lesscher et al, 2003, Rosas et al, 2016. The dose response analysis of ERK phosphorylation at these time points would further add to the accuracy of the bias calculations and provide a better understanding of the role ERK in the behavioural effects of μ receptor agonists.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation