1962
DOI: 10.1038/1951116a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Mercaptoethylamine in Repeated Monthly Exposures to Gamma-Radiation in Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Nelson et al (1969Nelson et al ( , 1971 found protection by cyteamine with fractionation intervals from 1-7 days provided the dose was neither too low nor too high. Efficient protection was obtained for longer intervals of about one month by Wang and Hasegawa (1968) with a protector mixture (dose reduction factor about 2) and by Dacquisto and Benson (1962) with mercaptoethylamine. Most likely the differences between the investigators are due to different doses, fractionation intervals, animal strains and compound utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Nelson et al (1969Nelson et al ( , 1971 found protection by cyteamine with fractionation intervals from 1-7 days provided the dose was neither too low nor too high. Efficient protection was obtained for longer intervals of about one month by Wang and Hasegawa (1968) with a protector mixture (dose reduction factor about 2) and by Dacquisto and Benson (1962) with mercaptoethylamine. Most likely the differences between the investigators are due to different doses, fractionation intervals, animal strains and compound utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1484 of the Euratom Biology Division contradictory (Cosgrove et al, 1964;Dacquisto and Benson, 1962;Doull et al, 1963;Holleroft et al, 1957;Maisin, 1968;Maisin et al, 1970Maisin et al, , 1971Maisin and Lambiet-Collier, 1968;Maisin et al, 1977a;Mewissen and Brucer, 1957;Nelson et al, 1963Nelson et al, , 1967Nelson et al, , 1971Upton et al, 1959;Wand and Hasegawa, 1968), and it is uncertain whether the late damage in the animals protected against the acute effects is repaired as efficiently as it is in nonprotected animals which received a lower dose corresponding to a same survival rate. In order to obtain more information on these questions -repair with respect to late effects and the effects of radioproteetors on this repair -normal and protected mice were irradiated at regular intervals until death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%