Role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with mild or moderate ventriculomegaly in the era of fetal neurosonography: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

Objectives To report the rate of additional central nervous system (CNS) anomalies detected exclusively on prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetuses diagnosed with isolated mild or moderate ventriculomegaly (VM) on ultrasound, according to the type of ultrasound protocol adopted (dedicated neurosonography vs standard assessment of the fetal brain), and to explore whether the diagnostic performance of fetal MRI in detecting such anomalies is affected by gestational age at examination and laterality and degree of ventricular dilatation. Methods MEDLINE,EMBASE, CINAHL and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies reporting on the prenatal MRI assessment of fetuses diagnosed with isolated mild or moderate VM (ventricular dilatation of 10-15 mm) on ultrasound. Additional anomalies detected only on MRI were classified as callosal, septal, posterior fossa, white matter, intraventricular hemorrhage, cortical, periventricular heterotopia, periventricular cysts or complex malformations. The rate of additional anomalies was compared between fetuses diagnosed on dedicated neurosonography, defined as a detailed assessment of the fetal brain, according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines, and those diagnosed on standard fetal brain assessment. The rate of additional CNS anomalies missed on prenatal MRI and detected only at birth was calculated and compared between fetuses that had early (at or before 24 weeks' gestation) and those that had late (after 24 weeks) MRI. Subanalysis was performed according to the laterality (uni-vs bilateral) and degree (mild vs moderate, defined as ventricular dilatation of 10-12 and 13-15 mm, respectively) of ventricular dilatation. Whether MRI assessment led to a significant change in prenatal management was explored. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used.Results Sixteen studies (1159 fetuses) were included in the systematic review. Overall, MRI detected an anomaly not identified on ultrasound in 10.0% (95% CI, 6.2-14.5%) of fetuses. However, when stratifying the analysis according to the type of ultrasound assessment, the rate of associated anomalies detected only on MRI was 5.0% (95% CI, 3.0-7.0%) when dedicated neurosonography was performed compared with 16.8% (95% CI, in cases that underwent a standard assessment of the fetal brain in the axial plane. The overall rate of an additional anomaly detected only at birth and missed on prenatal MRI was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.04-1.5%) (I 2 , 0%). There was no difference in the rate of an associated anomaly detected only after birth when fetal MRI was carried out before, compared with after, 24 weeks of gestation (P = 0.265). The risk of detecting an associated CNS abnormality on MRI was higher in fetuses with moderate than in those with mild VM (odds ratio, 8.1 (95% CI,; P = 0.001), while Conclusions In fetuses undergoing dedicated neurosonography, the rate of a CNS anomaly detected exclusively on MRI is lower than that reported previously. Early MRI has an excellent diagnostic pe...

Outcome of isolated fetal talipes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Fetal MRI has been shown to add additional information compared with ultrasound in fetuses affected by CNS anomalies. 49,50 However, its role in fetal anomalies not involving the brain is less clear. In the present systematic review, associated anomalies were detected at MRI only in 1 case, consisting of delayed sulcation.…”

Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort

“…2 iuMRI also improves diagnostic confidence and provides additional useful clinical information in 49% of women, which changes prognosis in 24%. 1 Subsequent work in smaller cohorts of women 3,4 and a meta-analysis 5 have also confirmed the superiority of iuMRI over ultrasonography, although the numbers of additional abnormalities detected by iuMRI were smaller than the MERIDIAN study.…”

Indications for MRI in fetal isolated mild ventriculomegaly… ‘And then, there were none’

“…Until now, there has been a significant overestimation of the clinical usefulness of MRI in fetal brain anomalies, due to a worrying underperformance of what has been labelled ‘Level‐II’ ultrasound but which was apparently inferior even to screening level in some studies. We feel, however, that the meta‐analysis of Di Mascio et al . did not complete the task, but instead has opened up a can of worms, the appetites of some of which look set for them to devour the conclusions of several papers, both old and new, on the topic.…”

“…Some light was cast on this controversy by the recent meta‐analysis of Di Mascio et al ,. which confirmed that, overall, clinically relevant information additional to that found at ultrasound was found on MRI (CRIMR) in roughly 10% of IMV cases.…”

“…In this Opinion, we review our recent experience of IMV and cases published in the literature (including, but not limited to, virtually all of the articles included in the meta‐analysis of Di Mascio et al …”