Role of Livelihood Capital in Reducing Climatic Vulnerability: Insights of Australian Wheat from 1990–2010

Abstract

In many agricultural countries, development of rural livelihood through increasing capital is a major regional policy to adapt to climate change. However, the role of livelihood capital in reducing climatic vulnerability is uncertain. This study assesses vulnerability and identifies the effects of common capital indicators on it, using Australian wheat as an example. We calculate exposure (a climate index) and sensitivity (a wheat failure index) to measure vulnerability and classify the resilient and sensitive cases, and express adaptive capacity through financial, human, natural, physical, and social capital indicators for 12 regions in the Australian wheat–sheep production zone from 1991–2010. We identify relationships between 12 indicators of five types of capital and vulnerability with t-tests and six logistic models considering the capital indicator itself, its first-order lag and its square as dependent variables to test the hypothesis that a high level of each capital metric results in low vulnerability. Through differing adaptive capacities between resilient and sensitive groups, we found that only four of the 12 (e.g., the access to finance, cash income level, total crop gross revenues, and family share of farm income) relate to vulnerability, which challenges the hypothesis that increasing capital reduces vulnerability. We conclude that further empirical reexaminations are required to test the relationships between capital measures and vulnerability under the sustainable livelihood framework (SLF).

Integration and Typologies of Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Case Study from Australian Wheat Sheep Zones

“…Comparing many different ways of performing the calculation of drought index, I selected six ways to express the drought index (DI) following the relevant literature that use at least three different calculation methods 18 53 54 55 56 . Firstly, the Soil Moisture Deciles-based Drought Index (SMDDI) of the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and sciences Regions (ABARER) was used as the drought index.…”

A convergent parallel mixed method of study for assessing the role of communication in community participation towards sustainable tourism

“…SLF employs various scaling and indexing methods to measure the natural, physical, financial, human and social capitals (Mengistu and Assefa, 2019). Huai (2016) reported that several countries have been encouraging their population to attain these capitals.…”

A Comparison of drought instruments and livelihood capitals

“…financial capital allows agricultural producers to purchase physical capital such as machinery); diminish others (e.g. school fees increase human capital but diminish financial capital) (Huai, 2016;Quandt, 2018); enhance resilience (e.g. through strong bonding relations in social capital); and increase vulnerability (e.g.…”