2015
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.233-234.745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Interface Transparency and Exchange Field in the Superconducting Triplet Spin-Valve Effect

Abstract: We study the superconducting transition temperature Tc of F2/F1/S trilayers (Fi is a metallic ferromagnet, S is a s-superconductor), where the long-range triplet superconducting component is generated at canted magnetizations of the F layers. In this paper we show that it is possible to realize different spin-valve effect modes - the standard switching effect, the triplet spin-valve effect, reentrant Tc(α) dependence or reentrant Tc(α) dependence with the inverse switching effect - by variation of the F2/F1 in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical approach that we employ for the analysis of the experiment in Fig. 3 is based on a generalization of [12] along the lines of [2728]. It allows to consider layered structures with different material parameters of all the layers and arbitrary Kupriyanov–Lukichev boundary parameters [29] of all the interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical approach that we employ for the analysis of the experiment in Fig. 3 is based on a generalization of [12] along the lines of [2728]. It allows to consider layered structures with different material parameters of all the layers and arbitrary Kupriyanov–Lukichev boundary parameters [29] of all the interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar theory for a F1/S/F2 multilayer was proposed in 1999 by Tagirov [3] and Buzdin et al [4]. Later, a triplet spin valve effect was described theoretically for S/F1/F2 structures by Fominov et al [5][6][7], who proposed another way to manipulate Tc, which is related to the formation of a long-range triplet component of the superconducting condensate at a non-collinear orientation of the F1 and F2 magnetizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Up to now, the role of the microscopic structure of the superconducting layer in S/F and S/F1/F2 proximity effects has received little attention from both theoretical and experimental researchers. Recent theories on S/F1/F2 proximity [5][6][7] treat the S layer as a flat and continuous layer without any more detailed discussion. Thus, in this work, we demonstrate experimentally that a significant cause of the small magnitude of the SSVE in metallic S/F1/F2 heterostructures is the rough surface of an S layer composed of overlapping islands, which can reduce ΔTc to zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the theory proposed by Fominov et al [9], the F-layers were represented by weak ferromagnets, whereas permalloy is not ferromagnetic. In addition, we ignored the limitation of the transparency of the Py1/Cu/Py2 interface, as was done in the theoretical studies of Deminov et al [21,22], because, in our case, this parameter would be free. In contrast to the parameters characterizing the transparency of the Py2/Pb interface, we cannot estimate this quantity from the experiment.…”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%