2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Grout Strength and Liners on the Performance of Slip-Lined Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum difference between the theoretical and the experimental results is 1.1%. The results also indicate that the plasticity approach and composite behavior method used by Smith et al [8] are likely not appropriate for rehabilitating an RCP given the behavior demonstrated by these specimens.…”
Section: Load-sharing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum difference between the theoretical and the experimental results is 1.1%. The results also indicate that the plasticity approach and composite behavior method used by Smith et al [8] are likely not appropriate for rehabilitating an RCP given the behavior demonstrated by these specimens.…”
Section: Load-sharing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Smith et al [8] used a plasticity approach to estimate the loadcarrying capacity of a slip-lined pipe; it was demonstrated that the moment capacity at the crown and invert was different from the moment capacity at the springlines and different methods were used to calculate the moment capacity at these sections; i.e., the moments caused compression in the CSP and the grout nearest the liner experienced tension at the crown and invert. In addition, the grout closest to the liner (inside of the pipe) was compressed, whereas the CSP experienced tension; therefore, the cross-section at these locations acted like an RC section where the pipe represented the tension reinforcement at the springlines.…”
Section: Load-sharing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations