2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/ab078b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of grain boundaries in Ge–Sb–Te based chalcogenide superlattices

Abstract: Interfacial phase change memory devices based on a distinct nanoscale structure called superlattice have been shown to outperform conventional phase-change devices. This improvement has been attributed to the hetero-interfaces, which play an important role for the superior device characteristics. However, the impact of grain boundaries (GBs), usually present in large amounts in a standard sputter-deposited superlattice film, on the device performance has not yet been investigated.Therefore, in the present work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also no major obstacles applying the atom probe to these materials to determine the bond rupture. Recently, APT has even been used already to characterize chalcogenide superlattices [ 187 ] as well as nanoscale phase separation. [ 188 ] Hence, regarding the property portfolio and the bond breaking, it is possible to conclude without doubt if a certain solid employs MVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also no major obstacles applying the atom probe to these materials to determine the bond rupture. Recently, APT has even been used already to characterize chalcogenide superlattices [ 187 ] as well as nanoscale phase separation. [ 188 ] Hence, regarding the property portfolio and the bond breaking, it is possible to conclude without doubt if a certain solid employs MVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APT has the capability of chemically characterizing materials in 3D on an atom‐by‐atom basis, which helps to understand the formation of nanostructures in metals and semiconductors. The technique has been applied to detect off‐stoichiometry around the grain boundaries in various semiconductors such as silicon, chalcogenides, filled skutterdites, zintls, oxides, and other systems . The results suggest that the resistance of the grain boundaries in Mg 3 Sb 2 ‐based materials can be attributed to a Mg deficiency that greatly reduces the local free charge carrier concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 These concentration-sensitive doping effects so far lack the corresponding microscopic explanations. On the other hand, the grain boundary plays a vital role in the behavior of GST alloys, 25,26 for instance, the grain boundary provides favorable doping sites for small dopants as observed in the experiments. 27,28 In addition, the structural distortions brought in by the boundary have an influence on the electronic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…43,44 Cojocaru-Mirédin et al reported that over 90% of grain boundaries in the GST alloys are high-angle grain boundaries, in which Σ3 twin boundaries account for a large proportion. 26 Therefore, the Σ3 (111) grain boundary (shown in Fig. 1(c)) containing 84 atoms is first constructed so as to simulate the polycrystalline model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%