2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00180.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology necessary?

Abstract: The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions in our series was 97% and the PPV for the three subgroups of lesion type was 100%; these figures are comparable with the best rates reported in the literature, despite the absence of onsite cytopathology. These rates are potentially a direct result of high-volume practice, dedicated endosonography and cytopathology. These results show that it is possible to achieve high rates of accuracy in places where logistical issues make it impossible to maintain a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Endoscopic ultrasonography allows for high-resolution imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures, is minimally invasive and has a low risk of complications. 3 It is often used as a complementary procedure to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of suspected malignant disorders, as its high-resolution imaging enables it to detect small lesions that would be difficult to discriminate with either of these 2 other imaging modalities. 3 Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography is routinely used to obtain histological samples of pancreatic lesions, submucosal tumours and lymph nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 Endoscopic ultrasonography allows for high-resolution imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures, is minimally invasive and has a low risk of complications. 3 It is often used as a complementary procedure to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of suspected malignant disorders, as its high-resolution imaging enables it to detect small lesions that would be difficult to discriminate with either of these 2 other imaging modalities. 3 Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography is routinely used to obtain histological samples of pancreatic lesions, submucosal tumours and lymph nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 It is often used as a complementary procedure to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of suspected malignant disorders, as its high-resolution imaging enables it to detect small lesions that would be difficult to discriminate with either of these 2 other imaging modalities. 3 Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography is routinely used to obtain histological samples of pancreatic lesions, submucosal tumours and lymph nodes. [4][5][6][7][8] In concert with the rising burden of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary conditions in Canada and elsewhere, [9][10][11][12] the applications of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography continue to increase and currently include drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, biliary drainage, celiac plexus nerve blockade and radiologic placement of fiducial markers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested above, the advantage of ROSE decreases when the per-pass adequacy rate is high and therefore lesions that are difficult to sample (or inexperienced/low volume centers) may benefit the most. This was also demonstrated in two studies (16,17), where per case adequacy rate was high and final diagnostic yield was not improved with ROSE.…”
Section: Studies Of Pancreatic Massesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As imaging techniques advance, some argue that there is no longer a need for rapid evaluation for specimen adequacy, especially in hospitals where this may be logistically difficult [6]. Indeed, some have even proposed methods for optimizing laboratory procedures in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy without using rapid evaluation [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%