2016
DOI: 10.1159/000445764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Porta Hepatis Lesions: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has recently been used for the evaluation of various lesions arising in the porta hepatis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of this increasingly utilized approach to porta hepatis lesions. Study Design: A retrospective study of 72 consecutive samples of porta hepatis lesions obtained via EUS-FNA between 2004 and 2015 was conducted. Clinical histories and endoscopic findings were available prior to the diagnost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 100 hepatocellular carcinomas, 18% were well-differentiated, 26% and 56% were moderate-differentiated and poor-differentiated, respectively. Biopsies of hepatocellular carcinomas were performed with large needles in 45% (45/100) and with small needles in 55% (55/100) (18).In comparison, the diagnostic success rate of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), as reported by Krister Jones et al, stands at 32% (19). PUS-CNB significantly outperforms cytology-based biopsy methods (8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 100 hepatocellular carcinomas, 18% were well-differentiated, 26% and 56% were moderate-differentiated and poor-differentiated, respectively. Biopsies of hepatocellular carcinomas were performed with large needles in 45% (45/100) and with small needles in 55% (55/100) (18).In comparison, the diagnostic success rate of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), as reported by Krister Jones et al, stands at 32% (19). PUS-CNB significantly outperforms cytology-based biopsy methods (8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where cholecystectomy was performed with suspicion of cholelithiasis and acute or chronic cholecystitis reveals infiltration by lymphoma or leukemia, blood tests (leukocytosis, abnormal liver function tests, raised CA 19-9), bone marrow aspirate, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of abdominal fluid for malignant cells, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for evaluation of lymph nodes in porta hepatic region should be carried out. In addition, abdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scan should be performed to investigate systemic involvement [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when combined with FNA, EUS had accuracy of 94% in comparison to 69% with CT scan[ 19 ]. EUS was able to detect significantly more lesions in the left lobe of the liver, sample hilar nodes (non-feasible by traditional imaging methods)[ 20 ] and characterize lesions that were too small and indeterminate for HCC on a CT scan. They proposed a diagnostic algorithm for evaluating high-risk patients with negative imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%