2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of emissions and meteorology in the recent PM2.5 changes in China and South Korea from 2015 to 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies have examined the post-2018 changes in PM 2.5 concentrations in China in detail (Zhai et al 2019 ; Chen et al 2020 ; Bae et al 2021 ) (see Table 3 for more detail), or questioned if PM 2.5 concentration levels had continued to decline after the successful experience by the Action Plan (Yin and Zhang 2020 ; Zhong et al 2021 ). One recent study on the PM 2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the surrounding areas (the so-called “2 + 26” cities) estimated that PM 2.5 concentration levels increased by 6.8 µg/m 3 (9.46%) in the winter of 2018 (Dec–Feb).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, few studies have examined the post-2018 changes in PM 2.5 concentrations in China in detail (Zhai et al 2019 ; Chen et al 2020 ; Bae et al 2021 ) (see Table 3 for more detail), or questioned if PM 2.5 concentration levels had continued to decline after the successful experience by the Action Plan (Yin and Zhang 2020 ; Zhong et al 2021 ). One recent study on the PM 2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the surrounding areas (the so-called “2 + 26” cities) estimated that PM 2.5 concentration levels increased by 6.8 µg/m 3 (9.46%) in the winter of 2018 (Dec–Feb).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we adjust the PM 2.5 concentration data following the official monitoring method change for comparison consistency (see “ Materials and methods ” for more detail). Third, we apply a stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis (Li et al 2019a , 2020a ; Zhai et al 2019 ; Chen et al 2020 ; Bae et al 2021 ) to decompose PM 2.5 changes into contributions from meteorological and anthropogenic factors. We further relate the human factor contributions to actual policy adjustment and the rising marginal cost of these policy measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 2013-2017, anthropogenic emissions of nitrate precursors of NO x and NH 3 were reduced by 20.7 and 3.4% in China, respectively, and the concentrations of nitrate were reduced in China. However, the changes in anthropogenic emissions over China led to an increasing trend of nitrate in South Korea and Japan, which can be explained by that the reductions in SO 2 emissions changed the balance of the ammonia-nitric acid-sulfuric acid-water system, creating free NH 3 that reacted with HNO 3 to form NH 4 NO 3 (Bae et al, 2021;Uno et al, 2020).…”
Section: Frontiers In Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uno et al (2020) reported that the observed surfacelayer PM 2.5 in Japan decreased in recent years, and the proportion of stations that satisfied the PM 2.5 air quality standard increased from 37.8% in 2014 to 89.9% in 2017. Bae et al (2021) showed that, from 2015 to 2018, the observed PM 2.5 concentrations averaged over 344 monitoring stations across South Korea decreased by 4.3% per year and the MODIS AOD in South Korea decreased by 4.7% per year. They also used the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify the impacts of the emissions and meteorology on the PM 2.5 concentration over 2015-2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional air quality model predictions of PM2.5 are typically evaluated with observations from surface network sites, but the spatially continuous RF PM2.5 fields offer more extensive coverage for model evaluation. We demonstrate this capability here with Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ version 4.7.1) simulations for the Korean peninsula including both South and North Korea at 9-km resolution Bae et al, 2021]. There are no surface PM2.5 data in North Korea to train the RF so we use the South Korea categorical variable to generate the RF PM2.5 fields there.…”
Section: Regional Air Quality Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%