2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of electrocoagulation in wastewater treatment: A developmental review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…EC is an electricallydriven water treatment having the potential to be implemented as a decentralized treatment unit. This treatment technology offers interesting merits as an eco-friendly option, including versatility, ease of setup, minimal sludge production without the need of chemical additives, and a small footprint without compromising the final water quality after treatment [25][26][27].…”
Section: Fluoride Concentration (Mg L 1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EC is an electricallydriven water treatment having the potential to be implemented as a decentralized treatment unit. This treatment technology offers interesting merits as an eco-friendly option, including versatility, ease of setup, minimal sludge production without the need of chemical additives, and a small footprint without compromising the final water quality after treatment [25][26][27].…”
Section: Fluoride Concentration (Mg L 1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operation costs include the cost of chemicals, electrical energy, electrodes, materials, maintenance, sludge dewatering, labor, basin and pipes, disposal, and other fixed costs not listed [41,75,77]. A simplified version of the equation of operating cost has been frequently used by authors when computing the techno-economic analysis for an electrocoagulator [41]: OC = aC energy + bC electrodes (27) where C energy is the cost of electrical energy (kWh m −3 ), C electrodes is the cost of electrode material (kg Al m −3 ). The coefficients a (price of metal) and b (cost of electricity) are different depending on the treatment location.…”
Section: Operating Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical methods allow one to extract valuable components from effluents with a relatively simple automated technological scheme of treatment, often without the use of chemical reagents. The main disadvantage of these methods is the high cost of electricity [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Analysis Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the dyes are considered harmful due to the high toxicity and carcinogenicity induced by their nonbiodegradable aromatic structure [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs), such as tetracycline (TC), ciprofloxacin (CIP), triclosan (TCS), carbamazepine (CBZ), salicylic acid (SA), ibuprofen (IBS) and sulfamethazine (SMZ), etc., are helpful to cure human diseases but the pollution from metabolized or partially metabolized pharmaceutical wastes is already recognized as a hazard [ 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%