1985
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1985.22187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of defect size distribution in yield modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once is calculated, can be obtained by averaging over all defect diameters . Experimental data lead to the conclusion that the diameter of a defect has a density function , which decreases as between and [24], [95]. is usually the resolution limit of the lithography process [32] and is the maximum size of a defect.…”
Section: B Probability Of Failure and Critical Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once is calculated, can be obtained by averaging over all defect diameters . Experimental data lead to the conclusion that the diameter of a defect has a density function , which decreases as between and [24], [95]. is usually the resolution limit of the lithography process [32] and is the maximum size of a defect.…”
Section: B Probability Of Failure and Critical Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the chip consist of blocks and have an average of faults. Each block will have an average of faults, and according to the Poisson distribution, the chip yield will be (24) where is the yield of one block. When each factor in (24) is compounded separately with respect to (17), the result is (25) It is also possible that each region on the chip has a different sensitivity to defects, and thus, block has the parameters , , resulting in (26) It is important to note that the differences among the various models described in this section become more noticeable when they are used to project the yield of chips with built-in redundancy.…”
Section: B Variations On the Simple Yield Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a number of models to compute random defect yield such as Seed's, the Poisson, the negative binomial, and Murphy's model (see e.g. [25]). The main difference between the various yield models is in the choice of statistics that are assumed to govern the spatial distribution of defects.…”
Section: Random Defect Yield Modeling and Critical Area Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this extent, the concept of defect-sensitivity is introduced, and several analytical defect size distributions are studied in conjunction with analytical yield formulae [8], [9]. As a result, a "design oriented" yield prediction methodology is developed which takes into account the layout, the process, and the environmental conditions of the manufacturing line.…”
Section: Layout Defect-sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%