2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0023-9690(03)00037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

24
131
3
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
24
131
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the difference found between AAC and ABC renewal in the present series of experiments is in agreement with previous evidence showing ABC renewal to be stronger than AAC renewal in other preparations (e.g., Rescorla, 2008;Thomas et al, 2003). Second, postextinction exposure to Context A (i.e., context extinction) was effective in decreasing extinction in Experiment 2, as was recently reported by Witnauer and Miller (2009;Experiment 2), but here we demonstrate this effect to be much larger for AAC renewal than for ABC renewal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the difference found between AAC and ABC renewal in the present series of experiments is in agreement with previous evidence showing ABC renewal to be stronger than AAC renewal in other preparations (e.g., Rescorla, 2008;Thomas et al, 2003). Second, postextinction exposure to Context A (i.e., context extinction) was effective in decreasing extinction in Experiment 2, as was recently reported by Witnauer and Miller (2009;Experiment 2), but here we demonstrate this effect to be much larger for AAC renewal than for ABC renewal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…AAC renewal is the recovery of an extinguished CR when acquisition and extinction occur in the same context but testing occurs in a different, neutral one (e.g., Bouton & Ricker, 1994). Most evidence suggests that ABA and ABC renewal are stronger than AAC renewal, which sometimes is not even observed (Crombag & Shaham, 2002;Cuevas, Rovee-Collier, & Learmonth, 2008;Nakajima, Tanaka, Urushihara, & Imada, 2000;Rescorla, 2008;Tamai & Nakajima, 2000;Tamai, Nakajima, Kitaguchi, & Imada, 2001; Thomas, Larsen, & Ayres, 2003;Üngör & Lachnit, 2008;Yap & Richardson, 2007). But in our opinion, why AAC renewal is weaker than ABA and ABC renewal has not yet been adequately explained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) may be especially prone to renewal. However, the data also confirm (see also Thomas et al, 2003) that it is possible to attenuate relapse (i.e., renewal) by conducting extinction in a context that is similar to the test context.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Traditional learning theories assume that the organism adapts to the new situation by erasing previous learning while acquiring the new one (e.g., Mackintosh, 1975;Rescorla & Wagner, 1972). This idea is challenged by phenomena such as spontaneous recovery by the simple passage of time (Bouton & Brooks, 1993;Rescorla, 2007), disinhibition by the presentation of a new stimulus before the target one (Pavlov, 1927), renewal of performance with the context change (Bouton & King, 1979;Thomas, Larsen, & Ayres, 2003), and some forms of reinstatement (García-Gutiérrez & Rosas, 2003) as all have in common that the organism retrieves the original information in the absence of new learning. Taking in account these results, more recent theories assume that when a cue is sequentially followed by contradictory information, the first-and second-learned information are both independently stored in memory, so that which information is retrieved at any given time will depend on the context where the test takes place (e.g., Bouton, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%