2016
DOI: 10.1122/1.4935128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of capillarity and microstructure on interfacial viscoelasticity of particle laden interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative contribution from the two governing parameters is not readily apparent, although the particle-particle interaction strength which is controlled by the sub-phase electrolyte concentration is shown to have a dramatic influence on the magnitude of the viscoelastic moduli, in good agreement with previous observations. [54] However, while the magnitude of the viscoelastic responses were different, it is interesting to note that the viscoelastic ratio for all three systems appeared to plateau towards G'/G" ~ 3.0 (Fig. 4b), underlining that the shear viscoelastic response becomes independent of the surface pressure when the particles are in a close-packed lattice above a critical surface coverage, , i.e.…”
Section: Interfacial Rheologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The relative contribution from the two governing parameters is not readily apparent, although the particle-particle interaction strength which is controlled by the sub-phase electrolyte concentration is shown to have a dramatic influence on the magnitude of the viscoelastic moduli, in good agreement with previous observations. [54] However, while the magnitude of the viscoelastic responses were different, it is interesting to note that the viscoelastic ratio for all three systems appeared to plateau towards G'/G" ~ 3.0 (Fig. 4b), underlining that the shear viscoelastic response becomes independent of the surface pressure when the particles are in a close-packed lattice above a critical surface coverage, , i.e.…”
Section: Interfacial Rheologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a follow-up paper, Barman et al [144] further investigate the correlation between interparticle forces, microstructure and rheology by changing salt concentration and surface-coverage for the same system under oscillatory shear ( figure 11(a)). They find that adding more salt leads to stronger interparticle attraction, which they attribute to screening of the dipole repulsive interaction.…”
Section: Shear Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to yielding was reported to take place at , which is lower than the surface coverage required for jamming ( ) [ 245 ]. The rheological behavior at the interface appeared to be regulated by the mesostructural organization of the microstructures highlighting the importance of local interparticle interactions in tailoring desirable rheology in interfacial systems [ 246 ]. It should be noted that using the same polystyrene particles, aggregation has also been achieved at the decane/water interface through the addition of 0.1 M NaCl and 0.1 mM SDS surfactant in the sub-phase.…”
Section: Interfacial Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%