The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2760(92)90094-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of adrenergic and cholinergic mediators in salivary phospholipids secretion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However the significant difference in total amylase secretion between SLIGRL-OH stimulation and pilocarpine stimulation demonstrates the higher activity of pilocarpine to induce salivary secretion and that the intracellular signaling of mAChR and PAR-2 is not completely the same. From these results, we consider that stimulation with SLIGRL-OH induces fluid secretion rather than protein secretion, which is mainly induced by ␤-adrenergic stimulation (Slomiany et al, 1992), although some amount of amylase can be secreted as reported previously (Kawabata et al, 2000b(Kawabata et al, , 2002b. The results also indicate that sympathetic nervous activity is not involved in PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However the significant difference in total amylase secretion between SLIGRL-OH stimulation and pilocarpine stimulation demonstrates the higher activity of pilocarpine to induce salivary secretion and that the intracellular signaling of mAChR and PAR-2 is not completely the same. From these results, we consider that stimulation with SLIGRL-OH induces fluid secretion rather than protein secretion, which is mainly induced by ␤-adrenergic stimulation (Slomiany et al, 1992), although some amount of amylase can be secreted as reported previously (Kawabata et al, 2000b(Kawabata et al, , 2002b. The results also indicate that sympathetic nervous activity is not involved in PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Isoproterenol-induced salivary secretions were much less than pilocarpine-induced secretions: 1.6 Ϯ 0.3 l/g in WT, 1.7 Ϯ 0.1 l/g in M 1 KO, 1.0 Ϯ 0.4 l/g in M 3 KO, 1.3 Ϯ 0.4 l/g in M 1 /M 3 KO, and 1.8 Ϯ 0.2 l/g in PAR-2KO mice, which are consistent with the fact that ␤-adrenergic, sympathetic stimulation evokes water secretion only slightly but mainly induces protein secretion after production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (Slomiany et al, 1992).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Saliva is formed by many chemical components (among which lipid) that may interact with each other to form a ''dynamic continuum'' responsible for the chemical, physical and biological properties of the saliva. [2][3][4] Salivary lipids may bind non-covalently to mucin so contributing to the visco-elastic properties of mucus. 5,6 Salivary glands synthesize lipids actively, 7 but the factors regulating the lipid levels in saliva are still poorly known, although it has been discovered that the secretion of phospholipids is influenced both quantitatively and qualitatively by either cholinergic or b-adrenergic mediators 4,8,9 and that the acinar cells of salivary glands possess receptors responding to either sympathetic or parasympathetic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Moreover, cells from sublingual glands in culture release phospholipids upon isoproterenol stimulation. 4,5,11 Cigarette smoke contains about 4000 chemicals, 400 of which are carcinogens. It also contains oxidants, such as oxygen radicals 12 and volatile aldehydes, 13 held responsible for damaging many biomolecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%