2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2010.2053379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROCR: An Energy-Efficient Dynamic Wall-Climbing Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorption methods for wall surface movement have used the following proposed techniques: by using the magnetic circuit that the magnetic pole of the permanent magnet was placed in turn, type that these were inserted in a caterpillar (Shen et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011), type using an absorption force of a sucker manufactured with a sponge or flexible rubber (Yoshida et al, 2011;Suzuki et al, 2010), type capable of movement on an iron plate by controlling an attractive force of an electromagnet inserted in a robot (Khiradeet al, 2014), type capable of movement on an iron plate by combination a permanent magnet and an iron wheel (Kim et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2008), type to adsorb by producing negative pressure using a pump (Subramanyam et al, 2011;Jae et al, 2013), by vibrating many caps of the sucker (Wang et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2010), type capable of movement on the rough surface such as the concrete using a claw gripper (Xu et al, 2012;Funatsu et al, 2014), type capable of movement on a wall surface using adhesive material (Provancher et al, 2011;Kute et al, 2010;Unver et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption methods for wall surface movement have used the following proposed techniques: by using the magnetic circuit that the magnetic pole of the permanent magnet was placed in turn, type that these were inserted in a caterpillar (Shen et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011), type using an absorption force of a sucker manufactured with a sponge or flexible rubber (Yoshida et al, 2011;Suzuki et al, 2010), type capable of movement on an iron plate by controlling an attractive force of an electromagnet inserted in a robot (Khiradeet al, 2014), type capable of movement on an iron plate by combination a permanent magnet and an iron wheel (Kim et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2008), type to adsorb by producing negative pressure using a pump (Subramanyam et al, 2011;Jae et al, 2013), by vibrating many caps of the sucker (Wang et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2010), type capable of movement on the rough surface such as the concrete using a claw gripper (Xu et al, 2012;Funatsu et al, 2014), type capable of movement on a wall surface using adhesive material (Provancher et al, 2011;Kute et al, 2010;Unver et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in motion control evaluates motion to develop effective way to save energy [5], [6]. In particular, they focus on issues such as optimized trajectory in energy point of view, short time task execution, etc [7], [8]. However, clear evaluation about contact motion does not yet exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots have also applied tails for a variety of purposes. Climbing robots often use a tail to provide normal force against the climbing surface, producing an anti-peeling moment [26] [23][11] [19]. Aquatic robots have used tails for turning based on hydrodynamic forces [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%