Abstract:George J. Borjas, Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy
Douglas S. Massey, Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, Aistd J. Edward Taylor, Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium
Alison Games, Migration and the Origins of the English Atlantic World
Joseph P. Ferrie, Yankeys Now: Immigrants in the Antebellum United States 1840–1860
Francine M. Deutsch, Halving It All: How Equally Shared Parenting Works
“…As Smil (2000) points out, it is hard not to be sceptical that the utopian vision presented in Natural Capitalism and endorsed here will not founder on the rocks of human nature and unanticipated side-effects which have scuppered previous utopian visions. So, what could be different this time?…”
Section: Stimulating Social Changementioning
confidence: 79%
“…a 90% reduction in intensity) would be necessary to achieve environmental sustainability. These books have come in for both high praise and heavy criticism (see Myers, 1999;Elkington, 2000;Herring, 2000;and Smil, 2000). Whilst there is little disagreement on the desirability of the principles proposed in Natural Capitalism, there is much scepticism about the extent to which these principles can be put into practice and the extent to which purely technological changes will lead to a more sustainable society.…”
Section: The Factor Four Revolution and Its Criticsmentioning
This paper addresses the possibility that improvements in energy and resource efficiency, together with a move towards the service economy, could help to stimulate the more profound social changes needed for sustainable development. The vision of resource efficiency improvements proposed in Factor Four and Natural Capitalism is discussed. It is argued that the key novel ingredient is the idea of moving towards a service economy, based upon the provision and sale of services, such as thermal comfort instead of energy, domestic services instead of appliances, and information services instead of printed matter. It is argued that this could lead to new relations between consumers and suppliers, a move towards sufficiency as well as efficiency, and could contribute significantly to moves towards more environmentally sustainable development.
“…As Smil (2000) points out, it is hard not to be sceptical that the utopian vision presented in Natural Capitalism and endorsed here will not founder on the rocks of human nature and unanticipated side-effects which have scuppered previous utopian visions. So, what could be different this time?…”
Section: Stimulating Social Changementioning
confidence: 79%
“…a 90% reduction in intensity) would be necessary to achieve environmental sustainability. These books have come in for both high praise and heavy criticism (see Myers, 1999;Elkington, 2000;Herring, 2000;and Smil, 2000). Whilst there is little disagreement on the desirability of the principles proposed in Natural Capitalism, there is much scepticism about the extent to which these principles can be put into practice and the extent to which purely technological changes will lead to a more sustainable society.…”
Section: The Factor Four Revolution and Its Criticsmentioning
This paper addresses the possibility that improvements in energy and resource efficiency, together with a move towards the service economy, could help to stimulate the more profound social changes needed for sustainable development. The vision of resource efficiency improvements proposed in Factor Four and Natural Capitalism is discussed. It is argued that the key novel ingredient is the idea of moving towards a service economy, based upon the provision and sale of services, such as thermal comfort instead of energy, domestic services instead of appliances, and information services instead of printed matter. It is argued that this could lead to new relations between consumers and suppliers, a move towards sufficiency as well as efficiency, and could contribute significantly to moves towards more environmentally sustainable development.
“…[Heartfield, 1998;Gilliott, 1999]. Meanwhile, for Vaclav Smil [1998Smil [ , 2000 and Horace Herring [2000a; it is the sweeping nature of this project and its supremely rational utopianism that is its ultimate undoing.…”
Section: Evident Weaknesses and Broader Criticism Of Factor Four And mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.