Rockburst Prediction Based on the KPCA-APSO-SVM Model and Its Engineering Application

Abstract

The progress of construction and safe production in mining, water conservancy, tunnels, and other types of deep underground engineering is seriously affected by rockburst disasters. This makes it essential to accurately predict rockburst intensity. In this paper, the ratio of maximum tangential stress of surrounding rock to rock uniaxial compressive strength (σθ/σc), the ratio of rock uniaxial compressive strength to rock uniaxial tensile strength (σc/σt), and the elastic energy index of rock (Wet) were chosen as input indices, and rockbursts were graded as level I (none rockburst), level II (light rockburst), level III (medium rockburst), and level IV (strong rockburst). A total of 104 groups of rockburst engineering samples, collected widely from around the world, were divided into a training set (84 groups of samples) and a test set (20 groups of samples). Based on the kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), the adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm, and the support vector machine (SVM), the KPCA-APSO-SVM model was established. The proposed model showed satisfactory classification performance: the prediction accuracies of the training set and test set were 98.81% and 95%, respectively. In addition, the trained prediction model was applied to five rockburst engineering cases and compared with the BP neural network model, SVM model, and APSO-SVM model. The comparative results show that the KPCA-APSO-SVM model has a higher prediction accuracy; as such, it provides a new reliable method for rockburst prediction.

Towards Development of Machine Learning Framework for Enhancing Security in Internet of Things

“…SVM is recognised as a discriminant method because of the logical approach it takes to tackle the twisted optimization problem it was designed to solve. A further advantage of these SVMs is that their hyperplane factor is optimal [21].…”

Prediction of dilution in sublevel stoping through machine learning algorithms

“…Given the current infancy in the use of machine learning in this area of study [22], it was deemed necessary to test the ability of three different algorithms and compare the obtained results for each of them. The machine learning algorithms to be tested in this study were carefully selected, taking into account previous studies done in civil engineering and their general acceptance in computer sciences, the selected algorithms for this research were: random forest (RF), knearest neighbors (KNN) and support vector machines (SVM) [20,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In order to apply these machine learning algorithms, it was necessary to finely tune the hyper parameters associated to each one of them.…”

Predictive Modeling of Short-Term Rockburst for the Stability of Subsurface Structures Using Machine Learning Approaches: t-SNE, K-Means Clustering and XGBoost

“…Furthermore, a particle swarm optimization (PSO) model was implemented to optimize the hidden layer bias and input weight matrix [29]. Li et al [30] established a hybrid model (KPCA-APSO-SVM), that was based on three different models including kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), the adaptive-PSO, and SVM. Several influencing parameters, i.e., the ratio of tangential stress (σ θ ) to UCS (σ c ), the ratio of UCS (σ c ) to the tensile stress (σ t ) and strain energy storage index (W et ) were taken as input parameters and the results depicted that the KPCA-APSO-SVM model has strong reliability in rock burst prediction.…”