Developments in Hydraulic Conductivity Research 2011
DOI: 10.5772/15669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock Mass Hydraulic Conductivity Estimated by Two Empirical Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collection consisted of hydraulic conductivity tests by packer test, slug test and geotechnical log data from drill holes. Hsu, et al [6] and Iskandar, et al [17] used packer tests to develop empirical models of hydraulic conductivity. Following the previous researches, this study was aimed at developing the following five alternative empirical models:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data collection consisted of hydraulic conductivity tests by packer test, slug test and geotechnical log data from drill holes. Hsu, et al [6] and Iskandar, et al [17] used packer tests to develop empirical models of hydraulic conductivity. Following the previous researches, this study was aimed at developing the following five alternative empirical models:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Hsu, et al [6] used only vertical boreholes, vertical transformation was performed for inclined boreholes in this study. This method was also applied by Iskandar, et al [17].…”
Section: Lithology Permeability Index (Lpi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations