2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-021-02413-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical methods to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of jointed rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the case of in-tact rock, 饾惛饾惛 饾憱饾憱 , Torbica and Lap膷evi膰 [65] state that 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 is also stress dependent (both vertically imposed and lateral) and they suggest that the variation of 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 in jointed rock mass approaches the behaviour of 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 of monolithic rock beyond a certain depth because shear strength of rock joints tends to increase to the state representing monolithic conditions when depth is large. This has been analytically proven and the stress effect is pronounced in jointed rock masses, especially towards the ground surface due to greater deformability of discontinuities along with block rotation [54]. Schock [67] has experimentally proven a similar finding where dynamic elastic modulus approaches the value of its static equivalent due to the closure of voids.…”
Section: Stress Dependencymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the case of in-tact rock, 饾惛饾惛 饾憱饾憱 , Torbica and Lap膷evi膰 [65] state that 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 is also stress dependent (both vertically imposed and lateral) and they suggest that the variation of 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 in jointed rock mass approaches the behaviour of 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 of monolithic rock beyond a certain depth because shear strength of rock joints tends to increase to the state representing monolithic conditions when depth is large. This has been analytically proven and the stress effect is pronounced in jointed rock masses, especially towards the ground surface due to greater deformability of discontinuities along with block rotation [54]. Schock [67] has experimentally proven a similar finding where dynamic elastic modulus approaches the value of its static equivalent due to the closure of voids.…”
Section: Stress Dependencymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Zoorabadi [54] identifies the shortcomings of the empirical approach and proposes an extended analytical solution to estimate the 饾惛饾惛 饾憵饾憵 of jointed rock, which has been earlier proposed by Li [52]. This is with a combination of the geometrical properties of discontinuities and 饾惛饾惛 饾憱饾憱 and finally incorporating the confining effects.…”
Section: Ebadi Et Al [53] Have Incorporated the Effects Of Lateral St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the specific contribution of leakage to pressure evolution is not fully characterized (Lee et al, 1995;Oda, 1985;Shahbazi et al, 2020;Snow, 1969;C. B. Zhou et al, 2008;Zoorabadi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To interpret hydraulic tests, analytical solutions, as opposed to numerical models, are typically employed in subsurface flow and transport applications because of their practical convenience and computational efficiency (Zhou et al, 2017;Zoorabadi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%