2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of multimodal biometric fusion methods against spoof attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
191
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been recently shown [3] that multimodal systems, if naively tunned, are intrinsically less secure than unimodal ones. This suggests each biometric modality needs to be protected by its own specialized counter-measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been recently shown [3] that multimodal systems, if naively tunned, are intrinsically less secure than unimodal ones. This suggests each biometric modality needs to be protected by its own specialized counter-measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Rodrigues et al [18] showed that such systems are even less secure if one of the biometric traits can be spoofed. Subsequently, Johnson et al [19], Akhtar et al [20], Marasco et al [21] proposed fusion methods more robust against spoofing attempts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this assessment we created an ensemble of payloads containing artificial anomalies starting from a set of legitimate payloads. Artificial anomalies have been employed both for training and testing purposes in Intrusion Detection as well as in Spam Detection and Biometrics [45,46,47].…”
Section: Sensitivity To Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%