2016
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2015.2512531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness Improvement of Speed Estimation in Speed-Sensorless Induction Motor Drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where His the weight coefficient. e accuracy and dynamic performance of the observer can be improved by adjusting the H value [20]. e typical value of parameter h can be designed as shown in the following equation: To analyze the unstable region of the open-loop observer and reasonably configure the feedback gain matrix to form a closed-loop full-order observer to eliminate the low-speed unstable region, the transfer function (10) of the linear timeinvariant forward path can be simplified as follows:…”
Section: Design Of Improved Speed Adaptive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where His the weight coefficient. e accuracy and dynamic performance of the observer can be improved by adjusting the H value [20]. e typical value of parameter h can be designed as shown in the following equation: To analyze the unstable region of the open-loop observer and reasonably configure the feedback gain matrix to form a closed-loop full-order observer to eliminate the low-speed unstable region, the transfer function (10) of the linear timeinvariant forward path can be simplified as follows:…”
Section: Design Of Improved Speed Adaptive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are highly dependent on the machine parameters, the back emf, inverter nonlinearity, and errors of the data acquisition converters. Different speed estimation methods with and without parameters estimations were presented [3][4][5][6][7][8]. These methods can be classified as different estimation methods such as direct speed calculation method, model reference adaptive system method (MRAS) [1], Kalman filter [2], adaptive flux observers (AFO) [3,6,7], intelligent control based methods (AI) [5], and sliding mode observer (SMO) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different speed estimation methods with and without parameters estimations were presented [3][4][5][6][7][8]. These methods can be classified as different estimation methods such as direct speed calculation method, model reference adaptive system method (MRAS) [1], Kalman filter [2], adaptive flux observers (AFO) [3,6,7], intelligent control based methods (AI) [5], and sliding mode observer (SMO) [8]. Nonfundamental wave speed estimation methods are a good choice at zero and very low stator frequencies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various methods based on machine model-based schemes have been introduced. The broadly known methods are open-loop speed estimator, sliding-mode observer (SMO) [12,[16][17][18][19], adaptive full-order observer (AFO) [20][21][22][23][24], extended Kalman filter (EKF) [13,[25][26][27], model reference adaptive system (MRAS) [28][29][30][31] and artificial neural network (ANN) based technique [32,33].The open-loop speed estimation methods are simple to implement but they are sensitive to motor parameter variations, which lead to the estimation error. In [12,[16][17][18][19], various SMO methods are presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%