2017
DOI: 10.2478/disp-2017-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness and Up-to-us-ness

Abstract: Frankfurt-style cases purport to show that an agent can be morally responsible for an action despite not having any alternatives. Some critics have responded by highlighting various alternatives that remain in the cases presented, while Frankfurtians have objected that such alternatives are typically not capable of grounding responsibility. In this essay I address the recent suggestion by Seth Shabo that only alternatives associated with the ‘up to us’ locution ground moral responsibility. I distinguish a numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sodium nitrite, Potassium carbonate, 2,2'-Azobis (AIBN) and all organic solvents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Solvents were purified by the usual procedure [55]. Other agents were used as purchased.…”
Section: Exprimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium nitrite, Potassium carbonate, 2,2'-Azobis (AIBN) and all organic solvents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Solvents were purified by the usual procedure [55]. Other agents were used as purchased.…”
Section: Exprimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much more to be said about the similarities among and differences between the multiple kinds of ability which comprise the n-way power required for free will, and the connection between those abilities and the 'up to us' locution (see Shabo 2014 andKittle 2017 for some initial explorations on the latter topic). I hope in this essay to have made a small contribution towards clarifying the project and so clearing the way for that future discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%