AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-6771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness Analysis of Integrated LPV-FDI Filters and LTI-FTC System for a Transport Aircraft

Abstract: This paper proposes an analysis framework for robustness analysis of a nonlinear dynamics system that can be represented by a polynomial linear parameter varying (PLPV) system with constant bounded uncertainty. The proposed analysis framework contains three key tools: 1) a function substitution method which can convert a nonlinear system in polynomial form into a PLPV system, 2) a matrix-based linear fractional transformation (LFT) modeling approach, which can convert a PLPV system into an LFT system with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that each manoeuvre is allowed to reach steady state before the next sequence is tested. Remark: Note, although the controller is designed based on the LPV model from [20], the SRS evaluation is based on the high fidelity nonlinear aircraft model [12]. Remark: The controller has been tested at the trim condition with an input trim [2deg, −1.59deg, 45568N] with an initial mass of 317000kg and with the flaps fully retracted.…”
Section: Srs Piloted Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that each manoeuvre is allowed to reach steady state before the next sequence is tested. Remark: Note, although the controller is designed based on the LPV model from [20], the SRS evaluation is based on the high fidelity nonlinear aircraft model [12]. Remark: The controller has been tested at the trim condition with an input trim [2deg, −1.59deg, 45568N] with an initial mass of 317000kg and with the flaps fully retracted.…”
Section: Srs Piloted Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPV model used for design is obtained from [20] T , which represent deviation of elevator deflection, horizontal stabilizer deflection and total engine thrust from their trim values respectively [20]. For the controller design the stateh e has been removed and the states of the LPV plant reordered as [θ,ᾱ,V tas ,q]…”
Section: Design and Srs Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vanek, Szabo et al (2011) show the application of the geometric LPV FDI approach to a complex, 6 degreesof-freedom (DOF) rigid body aircraft model. Previous approaches (Khong & Shin, 2007;Szaszi, Marcos, Balas, & Bokor, 2005) only considered the longitudinal dynamics of the airplane, which is applicable for the elevator fault detection case but as described in Vanek, Seiler, Bokor, and Balas (2011) designs based on decoupled dynamics are inherently limited to detection around the trim (cruise) flight condition and might be less robust to deviation from the trim operating point.…”
Section: Geometric Lpv Fdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential benefit of employing an LPV based design, the LPV model used as the basis of the observer will be imperfect, and this might cause false alarms or missed detections. For a LPV model generated using an interpolation of families of localized linear models (which is a commonly used approach), plant-model mismatch is present (especially) in the interpolated region where the model is not well defined (see for example [25], [29] for validation tests of an LPV plant comparing the actual plant states and LPV states). Other LPV generating methods will contain imperfect plant information due to simplifications and assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%