2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust visual tracking via online multiple instance learning with Fisher information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most trackers use statistical learning techniques to take charge of constructing robust object descriptors and building effective mathematical models for target identification. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] As estimated object position is converted into labeled samples, it is hard to give the accurate estimation of the object position. Wang et al used an inverse sparse representation formulation and a locally weighted distance metric to propose a sparsity-based tracking algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most trackers use statistical learning techniques to take charge of constructing robust object descriptors and building effective mathematical models for target identification. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] As estimated object position is converted into labeled samples, it is hard to give the accurate estimation of the object position. Wang et al used an inverse sparse representation formulation and a locally weighted distance metric to propose a sparsity-based tracking algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viola et al [12] proposed an algorithm, known as Fretcit k-NN based on minimum Hausdorff dissimilarity measure, and determined the class label of unseen bag by utilizing both references and citers. MIL approaches also have significant contribution to visual tracking [15,17,58] and real time video event detection areas [59].…”
Section: Overview Of Multiple Instance Learning Approaches and Their mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one positive sample (the tracking result) is used for classifier updating. Once the tracking result drifts away from the ground truth, the positive sample is inaccurately cropped [ 14 ]. Therefore, the interference from background will be introduced into the classifier, which leads to tracking failure.…”
Section: Introducementioning
confidence: 99%