2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2013.0551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust technique for the polarisability matrix retrieval of bianisotropic scatterers via their reflection and transmission coefficients

Abstract: A consistent algorithm for extracting the polarisability matrix of bianisotropic meta‐atoms directly from their reflection and transmission properties is introduced in this study. Considering a two‐dimensional periodic distribution of the scatterer under study, illuminated by properly‐polarised, normally‐incident, plane waves, the point‐dipole approximation is successfully applied in order to analytically compute the scattered field of the array in terms of the particle polarisabilities. Then, simulated or mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 is replaced by a set of equivalent radiating surfaces. Following the averaging process described in [7,19,20], the currents of these surfaces can be expressed in terms of the induced dipole moments as…”
Section: Induced Dipole Moments Evaluation Via Scattered Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1 is replaced by a set of equivalent radiating surfaces. Following the averaging process described in [7,19,20], the currents of these surfaces can be expressed in terms of the induced dipole moments as…”
Section: Induced Dipole Moments Evaluation Via Scattered Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, a set of induced dipole moments is derived, and subsequently, a set of scattered fields, whose computation at z = ±l leads to the reflection/transmition coefficients (or equivalently the S-parameters) of the 2D array. So, regarding the latter, if we use the evaluation scheme of [18][19][20], the induced dipole moments are given by…”
Section: Induced Dipole Moments Evaluation Via Scattered Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These methods can deal with scatterers of quite general shape and constitution but generally suffer from the necessity of removing the effect of the artificial periodic environment or the waveguide walls. This is done either by a suitable calibration process [32], [36], or by directly evaluating the interaction constants of the array [33]- [35]. The basic deficiency of the calibration procedure is the inaccesibility of precisely defined bianistropic standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%