2019
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust reward–risk ratio portfolio optimization

Abstract: In this paper, we propose robust portfolio optimization models for reward–risk ratios utilizing Omega, semi‐mean absolute deviation ratio, and weighted stable tail adjusted return ratio (STARR). We address the uncertainty in returns on assets by varying them in symmetric bounded intervals. The proposed robust reward–risk ratios preserve linearity in the resulting models, and hence are tractable. However, the robust models involve a sizably voluminous number of constraints, especially when the number of assets … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary analysis of these specifications shows that the effect described in equations ( 6), (8), and (9), where the autocorrelation effect distorts the mean value, standard deviation, and Sharpe's ratio, also causes a degradation in the correlation between Sharpe's ratio and other performance measures, which may alter the conclusions described by Eling and Shuhmacher [23] and Eling [25] and complements what is mentioned by Zakamouline [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preliminary analysis of these specifications shows that the effect described in equations ( 6), (8), and (9), where the autocorrelation effect distorts the mean value, standard deviation, and Sharpe's ratio, also causes a degradation in the correlation between Sharpe's ratio and other performance measures, which may alter the conclusions described by Eling and Shuhmacher [23] and Eling [25] and complements what is mentioned by Zakamouline [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sharpe's ratio shows an inverse relationship between the expected return and the risk level of a given asset and is measured by the standard deviation of the asset. Amenc et al [8] mentioned that 80% of managers use Sharpe's ratio for the evaluation of their portfolios [9,10]. is measure of market returns and risk is widely used by investors when they consider that the Sharpe property responds to the generation of data from normally distributed returns, and Sharpe's ratio has been widely accepted because of the direct linkage that can be drawn from modern portfolio theory, which was first proposed by Markowitz [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to that, numerous works have improved the model, creating more risks measures and proposing restrictions that bring them closer to practical aspects of stock market trading [43]. In consequence, many optimizations methods based on exact algorithms (e.g., [1], [2], [12], [61]- [65]), heuristic and hybrid optimization (e.g., [3], [6], [10], [66]- [73]) have been proposed to solve the emerging portfolio optimization models [24], [43], [58].…”
Section: Portfolio Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches in the literature that focus mainly on portfolio optimization (e.g., [1]- [12]), while other works focus mainly on portfolio selection (e.g., [13]- [18]), and some other focus only on forecasting the stock returns (e.g., [6], [19]). Furthermore, some works describe methodologies for up to two of these stages; for example, [20] and [21] focus on price forecasting as the first step of an overall methodology that is complemented with stock selection; the works [22]- [24] focus on both stock selection and portfolio optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worst-case analysis of the same is performed under the uncertainty sets considered by Zhu and Fukushima [48] and Kapsos et al [20]. Sehgal and Mehra (2019) [38] put forward robust models for Omega, semi-MAD, and weighted STARR ratios, by varying the uncertain input returns in bounded and symmetric intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%