2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iros47612.2022.9982225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Real-time LiDAR-inertial Initialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second (Method II) and third (Method III) methods were novel techniques introduced in this study, with Method III differing from Method II only in the inclusion of IMU prediction. Finally, we compared our approach to LI-Calib proposed by ZJU [ 24 ] and LI-Init proposed by HKU [ 25 ]. By comparing the results of these four calibration methods, we aim to determine the most effective approach for lidar–IMU calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second (Method II) and third (Method III) methods were novel techniques introduced in this study, with Method III differing from Method II only in the inclusion of IMU prediction. Finally, we compared our approach to LI-Calib proposed by ZJU [ 24 ] and LI-Init proposed by HKU [ 25 ]. By comparing the results of these four calibration methods, we aim to determine the most effective approach for lidar–IMU calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its potential, this method may have higher data requirements in practice. LI-Init is a robust, real-time initialization method for lidar–inertial systems proposed by Hong Kong University (HKU) [ 25 ]. The proposed method calibrates the temporal offset and extrinsic parameter between lidars and IMUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LiDAR coordinate system is denoted as (·) L , the IMU coordinate system is denoted as (·) I , and the first frame’s IMU position in the mapping process is selected as the global map coordinate system denoted as (·) G . The extrinsic calibration between LiDAR and IMU is determined to be fixed as TLI=(RLI,pLI) through a calibration method (Zhu et al , 2022). Ttrue^ represents the predicted pose from the Kalman filter, and Ttrue¯ represents the updated pose.…”
Section: Initial Mapping With Global Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the accuracy of calculating LiDAR odometry through frame-to-frame matching is compromised and the initial value estimation will be more difficult, making it challenging to obtain precise extrinsic parameters in the Xsens coordinate system through direct calibration using existing technology. Although we have explored various good open-source calibration methods for directly calibrating the VLP-32C and Xsens, such as LiDAR_-IMU_Init Zhu et al (2022), the results have proven unsatisfactory, as depicted in Figure 17.…”
Section: The Translation Vector T Imumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the accuracy of calculating LiDAR odometry through frame-to-frame matching is compromised and the initial value estimation will be more difficult, making it challenging to obtain precise extrinsic parameters in the Xsens coordinate system through direct calibration using existing technology. Although we have explored various good open-source calibration methods for directly calibrating the VLP-32C and Xsens, such as LiDAR_IMU_Init Zhu et al (2022), the results have proven unsatisfactory, as depicted in Figure 17.
Figure 17.The failure scenario of direct calibration between Velodyne VLP-32C and Xsens MTi-G-710, when the sensor platform is in a slow movement during initialization, occurring significant drift in the calibration algorithm. LiDAR_IMU_Init Zhu et al is used.
…”
Section: Sensor Synchronization and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%