2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0196-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip

Abstract: Clinical implementation of quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) of proximal femur stiffness and strength to assess the likelihood of proximal femur (hip) fractures requires a unified modeling procedure, consistency in predicting bone mechanical properties, and validation with realistic test data that represent typical hip fractures, specifically, a sideways fall on the hip. We, therefore, used two sets (n = 9, each) of cadaveric femora with bone densities varying from normal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
169
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
15
169
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the moderate predictions of the present study may be the relatively high portion of trochanteric fractures (71%), which appear to be in general more challenging to capture via FE. Another FE study reported good agreement for seven out of nine samples in the validation set (Dragomir-Daescu et al, 2011), while the distinction between "good" and "fair" matching was different than the one used here. In the recent study of Schileo et al location of failure onset was accurately predicted by the FE models for five out of six samples in fall loading mode (Schileo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Fracture Pattern Is Fairly Well Predictedcontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for the moderate predictions of the present study may be the relatively high portion of trochanteric fractures (71%), which appear to be in general more challenging to capture via FE. Another FE study reported good agreement for seven out of nine samples in the validation set (Dragomir-Daescu et al, 2011), while the distinction between "good" and "fair" matching was different than the one used here. In the recent study of Schileo et al location of failure onset was accurately predicted by the FE models for five out of six samples in fall loading mode (Schileo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Fracture Pattern Is Fairly Well Predictedcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Numerous previous studies used finite element (FE) analysis to predict fracture properties of bones via virtual mechanical testing (Ariza et al, 2015;Cody et al, 1999;Dall'Ara et al, 2013a;Dragomir-Daescu et al, 2011;Keyak et al, 2001;Luisier et al, 2014). In order to avoid the above mentioned complexities related to the dynamic event, most FE models aim at predicting the quasi-static behavior of bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, at a low load rate (quasi-static regime), the proximal femur behaves as a quasi-brittle material with a non-linear behavior till complete fracture [6,19,[36][37]. In this case, quasi-brittle behavior laws are well suited to represent the non-linear behavior before complete fracture observed during quasi-static proximal fracture experiments.…”
Section: Quasi-brittle Behavior Law Of Bone Under Quasi-static Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible applications of a triangular mesh was for finite element analysis (FEA), which computes and evaluates the mechanical properties of the femur [1]. The goal was to determine if the mesh built, using MC was also suitable for FEA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three papers by the Mayo Clinic's Division of Engineering [1]- [3] describe a technique to make three-dimensional (3D) models of the proximal femur geometry and mineral distribution using mostly manual and semi-automated methods. Their models were used for accurate finite element estimation of stiffness and load of the bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%