2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr07548d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust polyimide nanofibrous membrane with porous-layer-coated morphology by in situ self-bonding and micro-crosslinking for lithium-ion battery separator

Abstract: A novel polyimide nanofibrous membrane with porous-layer-coated morphology has been successfully fabricated by an in situ self-bonding and micro-crosslinking technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionic conductivity values of P-L10, P-L30, and P-L50 are 1.4 mS/cm, 1.7 mS/cm, and 0.89 mS/cm, respectively. The enhanced electrolyte uptake and porosity of the P-L30 membrane improves its ionic conductivity above all the other PL membranes [57,58]. The improved ionic conductivity of P-L30 membrane is further corroborated through the cyclic voltammetry measurements (Figure S5), in which the difference between the anodic and cathodic peak is found to be the lowest when using the P-L30 membrane (i.e., 293 mV), indicating high lithium ion transportation in the P-L30 case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic conductivity values of P-L10, P-L30, and P-L50 are 1.4 mS/cm, 1.7 mS/cm, and 0.89 mS/cm, respectively. The enhanced electrolyte uptake and porosity of the P-L30 membrane improves its ionic conductivity above all the other PL membranes [57,58]. The improved ionic conductivity of P-L30 membrane is further corroborated through the cyclic voltammetry measurements (Figure S5), in which the difference between the anodic and cathodic peak is found to be the lowest when using the P-L30 membrane (i.e., 293 mV), indicating high lithium ion transportation in the P-L30 case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their random arrangement stacking with a thickness of 260 μm generated an open porous structure with a pore size of around 1.2 μm which was about 28 times bigger than that (0.043 μm) of the typical battery separator based on polypropylene (PP), i.e., Celgard 2400. In addition to the thermal stability as high as 550 °C (vs. ~90 °C for Celgard 2400), much higher than the thermal imidization temperature of PI, GF featured much higher electrolyte permeability than the Celgard membrane, which made it an ideal model separator (or substrate) to investigate the effect of the surface functional group, i.e., PI, on polysulfide shuttling without disturbance of physical trapping in the internal pore structure [26,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to make electrospun composite nanofibers by directly dispersing nanoscale fillers in spin dope. Many PI composite nanofibers have been prepared by directly adding nanofillers or precursors into PAA solutions for electrospinning followed by thermal imidization [89,90]. Cheng et al reported the fabrication of PI/silica hybrid nanofibrous mats/fabrics by combining electrospinning and in-situ sol-gel synthesis [91].…”
Section: Pi/ceramic Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%