2022
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2021.3099449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Output Feedback MPC for LPV Systems Using Interval Observers

Abstract: This work addresses the problem of robust output feedback model predictive control for discrete-time, constrained, linear parameter-varying systems subject to (bounded) state and measurement disturbances. The vector of scheduling parameters is assumed to be an unmeasurable signal taking values in a given compact set. The proposed controller incorporates an interval observer, that uses the available measurement to update the setmembership estimation of the states, and an interval predictor, used in the predicti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the 6) for a Lotka-Volterra model: x(t), x(t), x(t) versus time t efficiency of the proposed interval observer, it was applied to a Lotka-Volterra model. Development of these results to interval prediction and model predictive control design as in [41], [42] can be considered as a direction for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the 6) for a Lotka-Volterra model: x(t), x(t), x(t) versus time t efficiency of the proposed interval observer, it was applied to a Lotka-Volterra model. Development of these results to interval prediction and model predictive control design as in [41], [42] can be considered as a direction for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, taking into account (10) and substituting (17) in (7), the dynamics of the system on the sliding surface is given by ė=true[A0+j=14αjfalse(ρ1false)Ãjtrue]e+Bu0,$$ \dot{e}=\left[{A}_0+\sum \limits_{j=1}^4{\alpha}_j\left({\rho}_1\right){\overset{\widetilde }{A}}_j\right]e+B{u}_0, $$ where Ãj=false(I3prefix−BGfalse)Aj$$ {\overset{\widetilde }{A}}_j=\left({I}_3- BG\right){A}_j $$. Then, according to Lemma 1 and Reference 35, it follows that prefix−trueAe_prefix−prefix−A_truee+j=14αjfalse(ρ1false)ÃjetrueAtruee++A_e_prefix−,$$ -\overline{A}{\underset{\_}{e}}^{-}-\underset{\_}{A}{\overline{e}}^{+}\le \sum \limits_{j=1}^4{\alpha}_j\left({\rho}_1\right){\overset{\widetilde }{A}}_je\le \overline{A}{\overline{e}}^{+}+\underset{\_}{A}{\underset{\_}{e}}^{-}, $$ where trueA=j=14Ãj+$$ \overline{A}={\sum}_{j=1}^4{\overset{\widetilde }{A}}_j^{+} $$, …”
Section: Robust Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the results of simulation are shown for the controlled system with x(0) = [2.2 0.4] ⊤ (solid lines correspond to the trajectories of the system, dot and dash curves represent the lower and upper interval estimates, respectively). As we can see, the proposed interval observer (6) generates accurate estimates and the control (9) regulates the system to a vicinity of the origin in spite of the influence of d. Since all admissible trajectories are evaluated by (6), the control ( 9) can be complemented with a model predictive one as in [49], [50], which can be a direction of future research.…”
Section: B Stabilization Of a Mechanical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%