2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2936418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Multi-Frame Joint Frequency Hopping Radar Waveform Parameters Estimation Under Low Signal-Noise-Ratio

Abstract: Robust estimation of frequency hopping radar signal parameters is the key to achieving stable jam in frequency hopping communication. In order to deal with the poor noise resistance performance of conventional time-frequency analysis based parameter estimation method under low signal-noise-ratio conditions. A robust method is proposed in this paper for frequency hopping radar waveform parameters estimation. The method is performed in time domain. Firstly, the pulse repetition interval of the received radar sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, two performance measures are defined to evaluate the hopping time and the IF detection performance, respectively. The ratio of the correct hopping time detection is defined as [14, 23] Pt0ptΔ=1Mci=1McDt(i),\begin{equation}{P_t} \buildrel \Delta \over = \frac{1}{{{M_c}}}\sum_{i = 1}^{{M_c}} {{D_t}} (i),\end{equation}where Mc${M_c}$ is the number of Monte Carlo trails and Dt(i)${D_t}(i)$ is the ratio of correct detections in the i th Monte Carlo trial. If the estimated hopping instant is less than three observations away from the associated true hopping instant, then the estimated hopping instant is declared the correct hopping time detection.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, two performance measures are defined to evaluate the hopping time and the IF detection performance, respectively. The ratio of the correct hopping time detection is defined as [14, 23] Pt0ptΔ=1Mci=1McDt(i),\begin{equation}{P_t} \buildrel \Delta \over = \frac{1}{{{M_c}}}\sum_{i = 1}^{{M_c}} {{D_t}} (i),\end{equation}where Mc${M_c}$ is the number of Monte Carlo trails and Dt(i)${D_t}(i)$ is the ratio of correct detections in the i th Monte Carlo trial. If the estimated hopping instant is less than three observations away from the associated true hopping instant, then the estimated hopping instant is declared the correct hopping time detection.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of incorrect IF detection is defined as [14, 23] Ef0ptΔ=1badbreak−1Mci=1McDf(i),\begin{equation}{E_f} \buildrel \Delta \over = 1 - \frac{1}{{{M_c}}}\sum_{i = 1}^{{M_c}} {{D_f}} (i),\end{equation}where Df(i)${D_f}(i)$ is the ratio of correct frequency detections in the i th Monte Carlo trial.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drone controller signals might be FH signals that have temporal statistical characteristics and they can be written as [6],…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, most well known FHSS signal detection methods adopt the time-frequency analysis and wavelet analysis [4][5][6][7]. It is shown that Wigner Ville distribution, Wavelet transform method, and array signal processing methods can be used to identify FHSS signals with the burden of heavy computational complexity which make them hard to satisfy the real-time implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%