2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust metal-organic frameworks for dry and wet biogas upgrading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Li et al noted enhanced CO 2 uptake for MIL-100­(Fe) and reduced CO 2 uptake for MIL-101­(Cr) in the presence of water . When examining MOFs for biogas capture, Chidambaram et al presented an aluminum MOF that maintained its CO 2 adsorption capacity in the presence of water, which was attributed to a hydrophobic CO 2 -binding site …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, Li et al noted enhanced CO 2 uptake for MIL-100­(Fe) and reduced CO 2 uptake for MIL-101­(Cr) in the presence of water . When examining MOFs for biogas capture, Chidambaram et al presented an aluminum MOF that maintained its CO 2 adsorption capacity in the presence of water, which was attributed to a hydrophobic CO 2 -binding site …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 When examining MOFs for biogas capture, Chidambaram et al presented an aluminum MOF that maintained its CO 2 adsorption capacity in the presence of water, which was attributed to a hydrophobic CO 2 -binding site. 46 Fetisov et al used molecular simulations and examined the impact of dative bonding on adsorbate molecules onto coordinatively unsaturated metal sites to show the limitations of the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) to predict CO 2 / N 2 and H 2 O/CO 2 separations on Mg-MOF-74. 47 Likewise, Erucar and Keskin et al identified leading MOF candidates for CO 2 /N 2 separation out of 54,808 MOF materials and examined the impact of water on the performance of these materials.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of CO 2 adsorption from streams are typically accomplished by different adsorption equilibrium, adsorption kinetics or molecular size. Widely-used adsorbents include activated carbon, metal oxides, gel materials, zeolites, and metal organic frameworks (MOF) [226,227]. Compared to amine-scrubbing, CO 2 adsorption takes advantages of a low energy penalty for CO 2 desorption, but suffers from a high-pressure feed gas.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we focus on adsorption technologies, especially materials (in this case, alternative ones), for which proper selection is a key factor in the successful use of this technology in biogas upgrading and cleaning [22]. Typical adsorbents used for the adsorptive separation of methane from carbon dioxide are usually carbon materials [23], such as activated carbons [24,25], carbon molecular sieves [26], and the increasingly popular MOFs [27,28], as well as their modified forms [29]. As waste materials, chars obtained from the pyrolysis of rubber tires have great potential [30], the same as adsorbents produced from biomass [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration the adsorption-based process, especially pressure swing adsorption (PSA), as a method to enrich methane from biogas [52], a useful tool to check the viability of such a separation is the performance of a breakthrough curve experiment [12,27]. In this way, it is possible to evaluate the performance of potential adsorbent materials and their use for upgrading biogas for transport applications or to satisfy pipeline specifications, naturally, without complicated full adsorption-desorption PSA cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%