2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-5079-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust interpretation of single and multiple self-potential anomalies via flower pollination algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each anomaly controls a different area with uncertainty less than 21 m for position and 16 m for depth. Furthermore, the data were inverted using global optimization methods [4,42,43], where the results suggest that all the anomaly bodies at this line are horizontal cylinders. The anomalies can be interpreted as piping or seepage [3].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each anomaly controls a different area with uncertainty less than 21 m for position and 16 m for depth. Furthermore, the data were inverted using global optimization methods [4,42,43], where the results suggest that all the anomaly bodies at this line are horizontal cylinders. The anomalies can be interpreted as piping or seepage [3].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the synthetic model parameters, the parameter model bounds for the search spaces and the inversion results from the IMSOS algorithm. Recently, MHAs have succeeded in recovering the model parameters of multiple SP anomaly sources, including BHA [9], PSO [25], the Genetic Prices Algorithm (GPA) [27], Very Fast Simulated Annealing (VFSA) [28], the Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [10] and the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [29]. GPA and VFSA need many more forward modeling evaluations for global optimization compared to the other algorithms [9,10,25,29].…”
Section: Self-potential Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, MHAs have succeeded in recovering the model parameters of multiple SP anomaly sources, including BHA [9], PSO [25], the Genetic Prices Algorithm (GPA) [27], Very Fast Simulated Annealing (VFSA) [28], the Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [10] and the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [29]. GPA and VFSA need many more forward modeling evaluations for global optimization compared to the other algorithms [9,10,25,29]. We compared inversion using IMSOS to PSO [25] and BHA [9], where both IMSOS and BHA algorithms were successful in inverting SP data containing multi-body anomalies.…”
Section: Self-potential Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of special interest is the recently published research of Sungkono (2020), where the author proposed to employ posterior distribution model of the SP anomaly inversion. The advantages of this approach are that the SP data may contain single and multiples of SP sources and this method does not require prior assumptions over the shape of the anomaly source.…”
Section: Some Common Aspects Of Magnetic and Sp Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%