2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust feature matching via neighborhood manifold representation consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these deep sparse feature point matching approaches are not able to solve the problem of spatially varying geometric projection problem for image areas with topographic relief. Furthermore, the use of only local appearance information will unavoidably result in a large number of false matches [50], which are not easy to be identified and removed, especially for images with irregular topography [51,52,53].…”
Section: A Deep Learning Based Sparse Feature Point Matching For Opti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these deep sparse feature point matching approaches are not able to solve the problem of spatially varying geometric projection problem for image areas with topographic relief. Furthermore, the use of only local appearance information will unavoidably result in a large number of false matches [50], which are not easy to be identified and removed, especially for images with irregular topography [51,52,53].…”
Section: A Deep Learning Based Sparse Feature Point Matching For Opti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, AI approaches have been considered for many applications of image registration. e proper usage of AI requires the availability of datasets where common training features exist [14][15][16][17][21][22][23]. A survey concerning all image matching techniques is introduced starting with traditional approaches, including Area-Based Matching (ABM) and Feature-Based Matching (ABM) methods, followed by a description of matching methods from handcrafted to deep approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the registration process should resist any imaging and environmental variations to maximize the similarity among captured scenes. So, the wide scope of registration approaches makes it difficult to compose these approaches since each one concerns a certain problem for a certain application [5,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional matching methods are based on the handcrafted local feature descriptors [4]- [7] to make the representation of two matched features as similar as possible and as discriminant as possible from that of unmatched ones. Over the recent years, the deep learning-based methods have achieved significant progress in general visual tasks, and have also been introduced into the field of image matching [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%