2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5669069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR Image Matching Based on Local Feature Detection and Description Using Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract: Feature detection is a vital step for the image registration process whose target is the misalignment correction among images to increase the convergency level. Deep learning (DL) in remote sensing has become a worldwide sensation. Despite its huge potential, DL has not reached its intended target concerning the applications of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. In this study, we focus on matching SAR images using a Convolutional Neural Network. The big challenge in this study is how to modify a pretrained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is difficult to remove the influence of speckle noise from the complex scattering background in the SAR images, and the observation of ground targets at different time and locations also leads to great geometric distortion and different radiation information differences in the same scene. These factors lead to false matching or mismatching in the matching process of the SAR images with large viewing angles, and the matching of misjudgment points also consumes a lot of matching time [19]. In addition, the method based on SIFT is carried out with manually designed descriptors, which is difficult to adapt to the complex geometric and radiometric differences of SAR images and will lead to registration failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to remove the influence of speckle noise from the complex scattering background in the SAR images, and the observation of ground targets at different time and locations also leads to great geometric distortion and different radiation information differences in the same scene. These factors lead to false matching or mismatching in the matching process of the SAR images with large viewing angles, and the matching of misjudgment points also consumes a lot of matching time [19]. In addition, the method based on SIFT is carried out with manually designed descriptors, which is difficult to adapt to the complex geometric and radiometric differences of SAR images and will lead to registration failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Otsu algorithm and the Canny edge detector are commonly used for image segmentation and edge detection. The Otsu algorithm selects the threshold naturally by looking for the maximum variance between classes in the data histogram [24,25], whereas the Canny edge detector detects edge regions by Gaussian filtering and the gradient magnitude between neighbor pixels [26,27]. However, for the Canny edge detection algorithm, using a single threshold for edge detection over a large area is incomplete, whereas SAR images tend to have localized features [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Otsu algorithm selects the threshold naturally by looking for the maximum variance between classes in the data histogram [24,25], whereas the Canny edge detector detects edge regions by Gaussian filtering and the gradient magnitude between neighbor pixels [26,27]. However, for the Canny edge detection algorithm, using a single threshold for edge detection over a large area is incomplete, whereas SAR images tend to have localized features [26,27]. In addition, SAR images of SGLs are influenced by the topography and surface environment, which cause each individual lake to have different boundary characteristics in SAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%